Skip to main content

Security report for energyre.com

energyRe · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

energyRe is a renewable energy company focused on delivering clean, responsible, and reliable energy solutions including generation, transmission, and storage. The company positions itself as a modernizer of energy infrastructure with a commitment to sustainability and community responsibility. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Drupal CMS and modern JavaScript libraries, with multimedia content and clear navigation. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not explicitly detected and incident response information is absent. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.energyre.com is a notable concern, reducing trustworthiness despite the professional site presentation. Overall, the website is well-designed and informative, targeting energy industry stakeholders and potential partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energyre.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention energyre.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for energyre.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

energyRe operates in the renewable energy sector, focusing on clean energy generation, transmission, and storage. Their business model centers on infrastructure modernization and sustainable energy delivery, with partnerships including major corporations like Google. The company targets energy buyers, suppliers, communities, and potential employees. The website content and press releases indicate active engagement in the energy market with a medium-sized enterprise profile. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests either privacy protection or recent domain registration, which should be monitored for legitimacy. The company maintains a social media presence on Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, supporting brand visibility and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, indicating a baseline secure environment. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which are recommended to enhance security. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which may impact privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, incident response transparency, and privacy mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues are introduced.
  5. Monitor WHOIS data and domain registration status to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce risk of impersonation or fraud.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
energyRe
Description
energyRe is a company focused on renewable energy, delivering clean, responsible, and reliable power solutions. They specialize in generation, transmission, and storage of clean energy, aiming to modernize energy infrastructure and increase grid reliability.
Key services
Generation, Transmission, Storage
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, JavaScript, Splide.js carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Professional renewable energy company site with clear navigation
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  5. Social media presence on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn
  6. Uses Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript libraries
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. Privacy and terms of use pages are present and linked
  9. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected
  10. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including Splide.js for carousels and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site uses canonical and viewport meta tags for SEO and mobile friendliness. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy features. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be investigated further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energyre.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energyre.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.