Skip to main content

Security report for energygroup.lv

Energy Group LV SIA · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Energy Group LV SIA operates a professional e-commerce website specializing in energy sector products such as electrical equipment, automation devices, and lighting solutions. The company targets both local Latvian and international markets, offering multilingual support and a broad product catalog. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with modern technologies including WordPress, WooCommerce, and optimization plugins, ensuring a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, indicates areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. The lack of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and structured data suggest a legitimate business. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and publishing clear contact and incident response information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energygroup.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
45
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention energygroup.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for energygroup.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Energy Group LV SIA positions itself as a medium-sized player in the energy sector, focusing on B2B and B2C sales of electrical and automation products. The business model integrates e-commerce with project realization services and partnerships with major manufacturers like ABB, Schneider Electric, and Legrand. The multilingual website supports Latvian, English, and Russian audiences, indicating a regional and international customer base. The company leverages structured data and partner logos to enhance credibility. Growth indicators include a wide product range and active promotions. However, the absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and best security practices. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  2. Configure and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Energy Group LV SIA
Description
Energy Group LV SIA is a company focused on energy sector products and services, offering a wide range of electrical and automation products including frequency converters, sensors, LED profiles, and more. The website targets Latvian and international customers with multilingual support (LV, EN, RU).
Key services
Product sales (electrical equipment, automation, lighting), Project realization, Partner collaborations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Kadence Theme, Google Tag Manager, WebP Express (image optimization), Breeze Cache plugin
Frameworks
Kadence Blocks
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for energy-related products.
  2. Multilingual support for Latvian, English, and Russian.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and optimization plugins.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content; recommend server-side header checks.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable; limits domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses the Kadence theme and Kadence Blocks for layout and design. It employs caching and minification via Breeze plugin and image optimization with WebP Express, contributing to moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site structure is clear with multilingual support and SEO-friendly metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, no hosting provider or server-level security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting the need for server configuration review. Accessibility features are basic, and further improvements could enhance compliance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energygroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energygroup.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.