Skip to main content

Security report for energogrupa.com

Energo Grupa · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Energo Grupa is a small engineering company specializing in solar power plant solutions, providing full-cycle services including design, construction, measurement, and maintenance of solar energy installations. The company targets businesses and communities interested in renewable energy, positioning itself as a niche regional player in Latvia. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energogrupa.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Energo Grupa operates in the renewable energy sector focusing on solar power solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, offering engineering design, construction, and maintenance services for solar power plants. The company appears to be newly established in 2023, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The website content is consistent with the business focus and provides clear information about services, targeting a professional audience interested in sustainable energy solutions. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers may limit direct customer engagement. The company uses modern web technologies but lacks visible certifications or trust badges that could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form security, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks DNSSEC for domain name security and does not implement common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in domain security, HTTP headers, and compliance documentation to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and customer communication.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Energo Grupa
Description
Engineering company specializing in solar power plant solutions, offering full-cycle services including design, construction, measurement, and maintenance of solar power stations.
Key services
Project design for electrical installations up to 35kV, Construction and installation of solar power plants, Measurement and monitoring of solar power station performance, Maintenance and repair of electrical systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on solar energy engineering and construction services.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Astra theme.
  6. Security headers are minimal; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  8. No certifications or trust badges displayed.
  9. Website is mobile optimized and has good navigation and design quality.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for typography and analytics, respectively. The site loads asynchronously some scripts like reCAPTCHA and zxcvbn password strength library, which is good for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. However, no advanced SEO meta tags or structured data (JSON-LD) were detected, which could be improved for better search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not explicit, and no CDN or caching mechanisms were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from SEO enhancements and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energogrupa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energogrupa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.