Skip to main content

Security report for energoauditors.com

Sertificēts neatkarīgais eksperts, būvinženieris Sandris Liepiņš · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website energoauditors.com represents an independent certified expert and civil engineer, Sandris Liepiņš, specializing in building technical inspections, energy audits, and related consulting services primarily in Latvia. The business has a niche market position with over a decade of experience, offering detailed and compliant services aligned with Latvian and EU standards. The website content is professional and detailed, targeting building owners, managers, and construction professionals seeking expert evaluations and certifications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress.com with Jetpack and Gutenberg, indicating moderate digital maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though SEO and accessibility are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energoauditors.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention energoauditors.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for energoauditors.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Energoauditors.com operates as a small, specialized service provider in the energy and real estate sectors, focusing on building inspections, energy efficiency audits, and certifications. The business model is fee-based consulting and expert services, with a clear target audience of Latvian property stakeholders. The website demonstrates strong domain age consistency and trust indicators such as certifications and detailed service descriptions. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a gap in regulatory compliance. The site leverages WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack tools, indicating reliance on established platforms but limited custom infrastructure. No advertising or affiliate marketing is present, focusing purely on service delivery. The business appears stable with a solid reputation in its niche.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections (clientDeleteProhibited, etc.), which enhance baseline security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency in case of security events. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries but lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance and security concern. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add incident response contact information or abuse reporting channels on the website.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in plugins or themes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sertificēts neatkarīgais eksperts, būvinženieris Sandris Liepiņš
Description
Independent certified expert and civil engineer providing detailed building technical inspections, deformation monitoring, geological surveys, laboratory testing, energy audits, energy certification, thermography, and consulting services primarily in Latvia.
Key services
Building technical inspection and reporting, Deformation and vibration monitoring, Geological surveys and sample testing, Energy audits and energy certification, Thermography and thermal imaging, Consulting and expert testimony, Lectures and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Gutenberg, FLIR thermal camera (mentioned for services)
Frameworks
WordPress theme pub/mistylook
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com stats pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack, WordPress.com Reader
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional service site for certified independent building and energy auditing expert in Latvia.
  2. Content is detailed and technical, targeting professional and private clients needing building inspections and energy certifications.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers or incident response info, room for security posture improvement.
  5. Uses WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack plugin, indicating moderate technical maturity.
  6. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected, minimal tracking via WordPress stats pixel.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with email and phone number.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress hosted on WordPress.com, using the pub/mistylook theme and Jetpack plugin suite. The technology stack is modern but standard for small business sites. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and CSS minification. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses WordPress.com analytics and tracking pixels, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energoauditors.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energoauditors.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.