Skip to main content

Security report for energex.ee

Energex OÜ · Energy · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Energex OÜ is an Estonian consulting company specializing in energy audits, digitalization, sustainability, and funding support services. Established in 2015, the company serves over 250 organizations across private and public sectors, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the energy sector. Their key offerings include energy and resource audits, green audits, digitalization roadmaps, funding application assistance, procurement management, and ESG analyses. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service descriptions and client trust indicators such as certifications and client logos. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with performance optimizations via WP Rocket and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics. Cookie consent is managed through CookieYes, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and SEO-friendly, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs some security headers, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating a solid security posture. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the business claims. Overall, Energex presents a credible, professional, and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and formalizing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energex.ee

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Energex operates in the energy consulting sector with a focus on sustainability and digital transformation. Their business model revolves around providing expert audits, strategic analyses, and funding support to industrial and large enterprise clients. The company leverages certifications like ISO 9001 and maintains a diverse client base across multiple industries, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website content and structured data indicate a clear target audience of Estonian organizations seeking energy efficiency and sustainability solutions. The company’s growth is supported by a multidisciplinary team and a strong partnership ecosystem, including social media engagement and client testimonials. Their market position is solidified by a consistent brand and a comprehensive service portfolio tailored to evolving regulatory and environmental requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, partial Content Security Policy implementation, and cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file indicates gaps in formal security governance and vulnerability disclosure readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and CookieYes is managed with lazy loading to optimize performance and reduce attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business size and sector but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information and consider implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Review and strengthen Content Security Policy headers to mitigate potential CSP issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Energex OÜ
VAT number
EE101968384
Registration number
14060193
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Energex OÜ
Description
Energex ei ole ühegi toote või teenuse esindaja – seetõttu tagame oma auditeerimisel sõltumatuse ning leiame just ettevõttele sobivad lahendused.
Key services
Energy and resource audits, Large enterprise energy audits, Digitalization roadmaps, Green audits, Funding application support, Procurement and tendering, Analyses and strategic development, ESG consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieYes cookie consent
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSP and lazy loading scripts
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to energy and sustainability consulting
  3. Strong presence of client logos and certifications enhances trust
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  5. No visible security or blocking issues
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with performance optimizations including WP Rocket for script lazy loading, preconnects, and preloads. It uses Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Hosting is managed by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with domain registration data. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO practices, structured data for rich snippets, and effective use of caching and lazy loading to ensure fast load times. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security-related documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energex.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energex.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.