Energetik Zlín, operated by Ing. Vladimír Gerlich, Ph.D., is a specialized energy consulting service primarily targeting small businesses in the Zlín region of the Czech Republic. The company offers external energy specialist services, technical inspections including gas and pressure equipment reviews, and heating system controls. The website is built using AMP technology, ensuring fast loading and excellent mobile optimization. The presence of structured data and certifications enhances the business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of explicit security headers indicate areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact information appear professional and consistent with a legitimate small business.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention energetikzlin.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for energetikzlin.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in a niche energy consulting sector, focusing on technical and administrative energy services for smaller enterprises. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on expertise and certifications to build trust. The website content is clear and targeted, with a focus on compliance with evolving energy legislation. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests limited digital maturity in compliance areas. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of user behavior tracking, but overall tracking is minimal. The company appears to maintain a local market position without evident partnerships or subsidiaries.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS and AMP framework, which provides a solid foundation for security and performance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, minimizing attack surface. The lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
Establish and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to build trust and readiness.
Improve accessibility features to meet broader user needs and compliance standards.
Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Energetik Zlín
Description
Služba především pro menší podniky. Spolupráce s technickým provozem energetického hospodářství, spolupráce při zpracování výkaznictví.
Key services
Externí energetik, Revize plynových zařízení, Revize tlakových zařízení, Kontroly systémů vytápění
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
AMP HTML, Google Analytics
Frameworks
AMP Framework
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS usage implied by canonical link (https://)
No forms collecting sensitive data detected
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses AMP for fast mobile-friendly experience
No privacy or cookie policy found
Contact info clearly presented with company registration and VAT numbers
No forms detected on main page
No explicit security headers detected in HTML
Google Analytics used for tracking
WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on AMP HTML, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site does not appear to use a CMS or popular frameworks beyond AMP. No hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. The site structure is clean with good SEO meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. No forms or dynamic input fields are present, reducing complexity and security risks. The technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with energetikzlin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energetikzlin.cz.