Skip to main content

Security report for enento.com

Enento · Finance · Finland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enento is a Finnish company specializing in customer data and analytics services, helping businesses identify and understand their customers through advanced segmentation and insight tools. The company operates a professionally designed website built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager to optimize user experience and marketing efforts. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, Enento employs HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and integrates hCaptcha to protect forms from automated abuse. The site includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, detailing cookie categories and third-party processors. However, there is room for improvement in security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and publishing explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website and domain registration data are consistent and trustworthy, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference. The domain age aligns well with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers slightly limits direct communication channels but is mitigated by contact forms. Strategically, Enento should enhance its security posture by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to build further trust and compliance. These steps will strengthen its risk management and customer confidence in its data services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 70 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  5. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching enento.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enento positions itself as a key player in the Finnish financial data services sector, focusing on customer analytics and segmentation tools. Its business model revolves around providing data-driven insights to businesses, enabling better customer understanding and targeted marketing. The company targets business clients requiring advanced customer data solutions, leveraging partnerships with technology providers like Google and Cloudflare for infrastructure and analytics. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market focus and professional branding. The use of modern web technologies and compliance with GDPR through detailed cookie policies suggest a growth-oriented and compliance-aware organization. The lack of visible certifications or extensive contact information may indicate a focus on B2B relationships managed through direct channels rather than public-facing support. Enento's ecosystem includes integrations with third-party services for analytics and security, reflecting a strategic approach to leveraging established platforms. The company could benefit from expanding transparency around security and compliance to enhance competitive advantage and customer trust.

Security posture

Enento demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of bot protection via hCaptcha. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR compliant, providing transparency on data processing and third-party cookies. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent areas for enhancement. No explicit security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could limit the company's ability to manage and communicate security incidents effectively. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant policies to demonstrate maturity and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Expand visible contact information to include direct emails or phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enento
Description
We help you to find, understand and get to know your customers. This involves identifying new customer segments and gaining a deeper insight into your existing customers. We offer valuable tools on the market for finding and analysing customers.
Key services
Customer data analysis, Customer segmentation, Customer insight tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, hCaptcha, CookieInformation consent management
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and third-party cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but cookie policy and privacy information is comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service page detected in provided content.
  5. Contact information limited to contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  8. Use of hCaptcha for bot protection on forms.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  10. SSL/TLS is properly configured and HTTPS enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The use of hCaptcha indicates attention to bot mitigation. The site loads external resources from reputable domains such as Google, Cloudflare, and CookieInformation, indicating reliance on trusted third-party services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security hardening. The domain registrar is reputable, and the domain age aligns with the business history, indicating a stable infrastructure foundation. Modernization opportunities include enhancing security configurations and expanding transparency around data protection and incident management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enento.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enento.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.