Skip to main content

Security report for endorconsultants.com

Endor Consultants LLC · Finance · Isle of Man

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Endor Consultants LLC is a small Isle of Man based professional accounting and financial consultancy firm specializing in tax advisory, audit, valuation, business acquisitions, relocation, and family office concierge services. The company positions itself between sole practitioners and larger firms, offering personalized service combined with broader expertise. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings targeted at businesses and individuals seeking expert financial advice. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and moderate performance. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a gap in compliance and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are present with a consent mechanism, but GDPR compliance indicators are minimal. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate risk profile with good business credibility but could benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer compliance documentation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would strengthen the site's trustworthiness and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching endorconsultants.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Endor Consultants operates in the finance sector, focusing on accounting and tax advisory services. Their market positioning targets clients who desire the personalized attention of a sole practitioner but with the expertise and flexibility of a larger firm. The business model is service-oriented, providing specialized financial consultancy including tax planning, audit, valuation, and family office services. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized firm with a professional approach. The absence of social media links and limited digital marketing tools indicates a possibly conservative or niche market approach. The partnership with Scorch Isle of Man for website development suggests local business ecosystem integration. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating independent operation.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which are important for compliance and trust. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be transparently disclosed. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense against web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance GDPR compliance by clearly stating data retention policies and user rights in privacy documentation.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly update all CMS components, plugins, and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Endor Consultants LLC
Description
Isle of Man based experts in Relocation and Tax Structuring, Business Acquisitions, Audit and Valuation services, Family office, tax planning and much more.
Key services
Tax advisory services, Audit and assurance, accountancy and other technical advisory services, Business startup advisory services, Relocation and advisory services, Business valuation, acquisitions and disposals advisory services, Family office concierge services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Slick Carousel, Featherlight Lightbox, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress 6.7.2
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a small finance consultancy.
  2. No terms of service page found.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  7. No visible security headers; security posture can be improved.
  8. No social media links detected on the site.
  9. No physical address explicitly found in the content.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via contact page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, leveraging Bootstrap 3.3.4 for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Slick Carousel for interactive sliders. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is present but limited, with meta tags and Open Graph tags included but no structured JSON-LD data found. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updates to frameworks and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with endorconsultants.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review endorconsultants.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.