Skip to main content

Security report for enda-europe.com

European Nurse Directors Association · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The European Nurse Directors Association (ENDA) operates as a professional association targeting nurse directors across Europe. The website serves as an informational and networking platform, providing resources and advocacy for its members. The organization appears to be a small, niche entity founded in 2010, with a clear focus on healthcare professionals in the nursing leadership sector. The website's branding and content are consistent with its mission and audience, emphasizing professionalism and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various plugins such as Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting is provided by aditsystems.hosting, and the domain is secured with HTTPS and a clientTransferProhibited status, indicating a stable and secure domain registration. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the analysis. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages in the provided content is a notable gap in compliance documentation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and transparency documents. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website presenting as a legitimate, professional association site with minimal tracking and good privacy compliance via Cookiebot. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 26 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enda-europe.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENDA occupies a specialized niche within the European healthcare sector, focusing on nurse directors. Its business model is that of a non-profit professional association, relying on membership and advocacy rather than commercial revenue streams. The website supports this model by providing informational content and facilitating community engagement. The presence of social media links and a search function indicates an intent to maintain active communication channels. The organization’s longevity since 2010 suggests stability and a sustained market presence. However, the lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers may limit direct engagement opportunities. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The website’s content quality and branding consistency support its credibility within its target audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy documents are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity, enhancing form security. To improve, the organization should implement recommended security headers, publish security policies, and establish clear incident response contacts. These steps will enhance compliance with GDPR and NIS2 directives and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Nurse Directors Association
Description
European Nurse Directors Association
Key services
Professional networking, Information sharing, Advocacy for nurse directors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Lightbox2, OwlCarousel2, Nextend Smart Slider 3 Pro, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association site for European nurse directors.
  2. Content is accessible and well structured.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact form and Facebook page provided.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Domain is secured with HTTPS and clientTransferProhibited status.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design and jQuery 3.7.1 for client-side scripting. It incorporates several plugins including Nextend Smart Slider 3 Pro for visual content and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs such as Google Fonts, FontAwesome, MaxCDN, and Cloudflare. The hosting provider is aditsystems.hosting, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the website and breadcrumb navigation. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical debt and modernize the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enda-europe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enda-europe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.