Skip to main content

Security report for enbro.com

Enbro · Energy · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enbro is a Belgian energy brokerage company specializing in managing and optimizing energy contracts for professional clients. Established in 2013, it positions itself as the largest energy broker in Europe, offering free and independent consultancy services tailored to business needs. The website is content-rich, featuring detailed service descriptions, testimonials, and educational blog posts, targeting entrepreneurs and businesses seeking energy cost savings and sustainable solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers in place, though the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enbro.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enbro operates in the energy sector, focusing on energy contract brokerage and consultancy for professional clients. Its business model revolves around providing free services to clients while likely monetizing through partnerships with energy suppliers. The company emphasizes personalized advice, continuous contract monitoring, and sustainable energy solutions, positioning itself as a market leader in Europe. The website's extensive testimonials and video content enhance credibility and customer trust. The target audience is medium to large enterprises and entrepreneurs in Belgium. The company maintains active social media channels and regularly publishes industry-relevant blog content, indicating a mature digital presence and engagement strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and the use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents compliance and transparency gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is strong but could be improved by adding formal policies and contact points for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal transparency.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security and abuse emails.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enbro
Description
Enbro is an energy broker that manages energy contracts from A to Z, guiding professional clients to the right energy tariff tailored to their needs. They offer free, independent, and comprehensive energy consultancy services focused on cost savings and contract optimization.
Key services
energy contract optimization, personalized energy advice, energy consumption analysis, sustainable energy solutions, continuous contract monitoring and automatic optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Swiper, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Simple Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Simple Analytics
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on energy brokerage services for professional clients.
  3. Good use of testimonials and video content to build trust.
  4. Cookie consent and tracking scripts are implemented.
  5. Lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, supported by jQuery and popular libraries like Slick Carousel and Swiper for UI components. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Simple Analytics, with consent managed by Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with Yoast SEO plugin usage. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enbro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enbro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.