Skip to main content

Security report for enapo.cz

ENAPO OBCHODNÍ a.s. · Energy · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENAPO OBCHODNÍ a.s. is a Czech Republic based company operating in the energy sector, likely focused on trading or commercial activities related to energy. The company has an established presence with a domain registered since 1999, indicating a mature business. However, the website itself is extremely minimalistic, containing only a logo and no substantive content, contact information, or policies. This limits the digital maturity and user engagement potential of the site. Technically, the website lacks modern features such as HTTPS, security headers, SEO metadata, and accessibility optimizations. There are no scripts or external resources detected, and no CMS or frameworks are identifiable. The site is not mobile optimized and provides a poor user experience due to minimal content and lack of navigation. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security policies is a significant concern. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response or security contact information is available. The WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the domain and business. However, the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation exposes the company to potential risks. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile in terms of malicious content but suffers from poor content quality, lack of security measures, and minimal user engagement features. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and website content are recommended to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enapo.cz

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENAPO OBCHODNÍ a.s. appears to be an established player in the Czech energy sector with a long-standing domain since 1999. The business model likely revolves around B2B energy trading or commercial services. The lack of detailed website content limits insights into revenue streams or competitive advantages. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website. The minimal digital footprint suggests a traditional business approach with limited online engagement. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current data.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and published security policies. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response mechanisms are visible. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No analytics or tracking technologies are used, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent, supporting domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Enhance website content with business descriptions, services, and navigation to improve user experience and trust.
  5. Adopt security best practices including security headers and incident response procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENAPO OBCHODNÍ a.s.
Description
ENAPO OBCHODNÍ a.s. appears to be a company operating in the energy sector, likely involved in trading or commercial activities related to energy, based on the company name and domain.
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal with only a logo and no substantive information.
  2. No metadata beyond basic author and copyright tags; no SEO or social media metadata.
  3. No forms, no contact details, no policies published on the site.
  4. No scripts or external resources detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  6. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain registered in Czech Republic.
  7. No advertising, analytics, or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Website is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility features.
  9. No evidence of GDPR compliance or privacy/cookie policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and no detectable CMS or frameworks. There are no external scripts or libraries loaded, indicating a very basic technical infrastructure. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but could be improved with modern web standards. The absence of SEO metadata and structured data limits search engine visibility. Technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization is needed to improve security and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enapo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enapo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.