Skip to main content

Security report for ena.ae

Emirates Nursing Association · Healthcare · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Emirates Nursing Association (ENA) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to strengthening the nursing profession within the United Arab Emirates. The website reflects a professional nonprofit association with a clear focus on healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. The organization is a member of the International Nursing Council since 2005, indicating established international ties and credibility. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard polyfills to ensure compatibility and performance. While the site is mobile optimized and presents a consistent brand image, it lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and some cookie handling scripts, but additional security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact and security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ena.ae

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENA operates as a nonprofit professional association in the healthcare sector, targeting nursing professionals and healthcare stakeholders in the UAE. Its business model focuses on membership and professional development services. The organization's market position is supported by its longstanding membership in the International Nursing Council, enhancing its credibility. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting the association's mission. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may limit user engagement and trust. The technical infrastructure is modern but basic, relying on Wix's managed hosting and CMS services. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses scripts to restrict sensitive cookie access, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting additional security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Emirates Nursing Association
Description
The Emirates Nursing Association (ENA) is a nonprofit organization established and exists exclusively to strengthen the nursing profession in the United Arab Emirates. ENA has been a member with International Nursing Council (ICN) since May 2005. Join us to make a difference.
Key services
Strengthening nursing profession, Membership services, Professional development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Wix platform, Polyfills for Intl.Segmenter, Core-js, Focus-within polyfill
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie handling scripts to restrict sensitive cookies

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage HTML
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  5. SEO metadata present but basic; Open Graph and Twitter cards configured
  6. JSON-LD structured data for WebSite type present but minimal
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No incident response or security contact information found
  9. No certifications or compliance badges visible in HTML
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix platform scripts
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern JavaScript and CSS infrastructure with polyfills for browser compatibility. Hosting is managed by Wix, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. Performance is moderate, with standard Wix optimizations but no advanced performance tuning detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO metadata is present but basic, with Open Graph and Twitter card tags configured. Accessibility features are minimal, with scope for improvement. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating a minimal tracking footprint.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ena.ae. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ena.ae.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.