Skip to main content

Security report for emdgroup.com

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany operates as a leading global science and technology company with core business sectors in healthcare, life science, and electronics. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong global presence, targeting scientific and business audiences worldwide. The company offers a broad range of products and services, emphasizing innovation and accessibility. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Adobe DTM. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and excellent accessibility features, including an embedded accessibility tool supporting various user needs. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and does not publicly disclose a security policy or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the professional presentation and compliance indicators. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations. Strategic improvements could focus on enhancing security transparency and WHOIS data availability to further bolster trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emdgroup.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
97
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention emdgroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
68
Employees
0
Customers
60
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
10%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for emdgroup.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Merck KGaA holds a strong market position as a science and technology leader with diversified sectors including healthcare and life sciences. Its business model is primarily B2B with some B2C elements, serving global scientific communities and industries. The company benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem, including subsidiaries like EMD Serono. The website's multilingual support and comprehensive accessibility features indicate a commitment to global reach and inclusivity. Revenue streams likely include pharmaceuticals, scientific instruments, and electronic materials. Growth indicators include advanced digital infrastructure and active marketing via analytics and social media channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. Security best practices such as no exposed sensitive data and accessibility compliance are observed. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program represent gaps. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented. The missing WHOIS data reduces transparency but is not necessarily indicative of malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and enhancing header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer or security team to improve transparency.
  5. Address the WHOIS data absence by ensuring accurate domain registration information is publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Description
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, a leading science and technology company, operates across healthcare, life science and electronics.
Key services
Healthcare, Life Science, Electronics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, ShareThis, Adobe DTM
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Accessibility compliance features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and advanced accessibility features.
  2. Strong focus on accessibility with a comprehensive accessibility tool embedded.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are clearly presented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags in content or scripts.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency but does not directly indicate fraud.
  7. No terms of service page found, which is a minor compliance gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Adobe Helix RUM for performance monitoring. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, with marketing tools like ShareThis integrated. The site is mobile optimized and includes advanced accessibility features, such as a comprehensive accessibility widget supporting multiple disabilities. Performance is moderate with preconnect and DNS-prefetch optimizations. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve WHOIS transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emdgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emdgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.