Skip to main content

Security report for elrey.fi

Taqueria El Rey · Hospitality · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taqueria El Rey is a small, cozy Mexican restaurant located in the heart of Helsinki, Finland. The business focuses on offering authentic Mexican tacos and handcrafted cocktails in a trendy and relaxed atmosphere. Their services include dine-in, takeaway, and home delivery via Wolt, positioning them as a local hospitality provider catering to general audiences seeking Mexican cuisine. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and active social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Yoast SEO, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Analytics for tracking. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity and business credibility with no critical security or compliance issues detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elrey.fi

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The restaurant operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on Mexican cuisine in Helsinki. Their business model includes direct customer engagement through dine-in and digital channels for bookings and delivery. Partnerships with DinnerBooking, Ravintola.fi for gift cards, and Wolt for delivery enhance their service ecosystem. The company targets local residents and visitors interested in authentic Mexican food and cocktails. The website content and structure support effective customer interaction and marketing efforts. Growth potential lies in expanding digital ordering and marketing reach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent small business operation.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent management is implemented via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business size and risk profile but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and periodic security audits to proactively identify and address risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Taqueria El Rey
Description
Taqueria El Rey on viihtyisä meksikolainen ravintola Helsingin keskustassa. Tarjoamme aitoja meksikolaisia tacoja ja käsityönä tehtyjä cocktaileja trendikkäässä ja rennossa tunnelmassa.
Key services
Authentic Mexican tacos, Handcrafted cocktails, Dine-in restaurant, Takeaway and home delivery via Wolt
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Slick Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot consent management, Custobar marketing integration
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Custobar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a Mexican restaurant in Helsinki.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management are implemented.
  3. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook is active and linked.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy documents found.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices observed.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0.2 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, jQuery for scripting, and Slick Carousel for UI elements. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, and Custobar is integrated for marketing automation. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with appropriate consent. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are good, supporting a positive user experience. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with standard WordPress ecosystem components and good SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elrey.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elrey.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.