Skip to main content

Security report for elo.city

Elocity Sp z o.o. · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elocity Sp z o.o. is a Polish company specializing in electric vehicle charging infrastructure, offering public charging stations, management systems, and a mobile application for EV drivers. The company targets businesses, investors, and fleet operators, positioning itself as a key player in Poland's growing electromobility market. Their website demonstrates a professional digital presence with comprehensive content, press releases, and active partnerships with major corporations such as Coca-Cola and E.ON. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. However, there are gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices, such as missing privacy and cookie policies, lack of DNSSEC, and absence of security headers. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elo.city

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention elo.city, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
36
Employees
3
Customers
18
Third parties
15
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2025-08-22 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for elo.city.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –eleport-panel.elo.city2025-08-22
  • –elo.city2025-07-05
  • –panel.elo.city2025-07-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elocity operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on EV charging solutions for commercial clients and fleet managers. Their business model includes sales and leasing of charging stations, software management platforms, and consulting services to optimize revenue from electromobility. The company has established a strong partnership ecosystem and is a member of relevant industry associations, enhancing its market credibility. Growth indicators include multiple press releases and collaborations with large enterprises. The target customer segments are diverse, including logistics, retail centers, municipalities, and HoReCa sectors. The company leverages digital marketing and tracking tools to engage users and prospects effectively.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections but lacks advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) and critical HTTP security headers. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The use of third-party analytics and session recording tools introduces moderate user tracking, which is not fully complemented by privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. These gaps represent compliance and security risks, especially under GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact reduces transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security contact information.
  5. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elocity Sp z o.o.
Description
Dostarczamy stacje ładowania samochodów elektrycznych, system zarządzania stacją ładowania samochodu elektrycznego oraz aplikację do ładowania samochodów elektrycznych. Obsługujemy przedsiębiorców, inwestorów i korporacje, doradzając jak zarabiać na elektromobilności.
Key services
Publiczne punkty ładowania pojazdów elektrycznych, System zarządzania stacjami ładowania, Aplikacja mobilna do ładowania EV, Doradztwo i wsparcie inwestycji w elektromobilność
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Swiper 4.5.0, Font Awesome 6.4.2, intl-tel-input 17.0.12, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Smartlook (user session recording)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URLs)
  • Use of security flags in domain status (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook
Marketing tools
Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Multiple contact methods provided including phone, email, and forms.
  4. Strong presence of press releases and news indicating active business operations.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Swiper, Font Awesome, and intl-tel-input for enhanced user experience and international phone input. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics, supplemented by Smartlook for session recording. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with font size and contrast controls. Hosting and domain registration are managed via GoDaddy, with domain age consistent with business claims. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing scripts and assets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elo.city. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elo.city.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.