Skip to main content

Security report for elmelohergrill.de

Elmeloher Grill · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elmeloher Grill is a small hospitality business operating a restaurant and grill located in Ganderkesee, Germany. The business offers traditional grill dishes, daily lunch specials, weekly menus, and catering services branded as 'Brünings Partyservice'. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and includes modern plugins for contact forms and GDPR compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and social media links, supporting good customer engagement. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Marketing is supported via Facebook Pixel tracking. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy online presence for a local restaurant and catering service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elmelohergrill.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention elmelohergrill.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for elmelohergrill.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local customers and event organizers seeking catering and dining services. It leverages online ordering and social media to enhance reach. The partnership with 'Brünings Partyservice' indicates a diversified revenue stream beyond onsite dining. The website's integration with a job application funnel suggests growth and staffing efforts. The market position is local and service-oriented without claims of scale or leadership. The use of standard WordPress infrastructure and plugins indicates moderate digital maturity with room for technical and security enhancements.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no published security or incident response policies exist. The use of popular plugins like Contact Form 7 and Elementor requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Facebook Pixel integration introduces moderate user tracking, balanced by consent mechanisms. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality site but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elmeloher Grill
Description
Restaurant und Imbiss offering grill classics, daily changing lunch menus, weekly dishes, and catering services under 'Brünings Partyservice'. Located at Elmeloher Straße 86, 27777 Ganderkesee, Germany.
Key services
Grill restaurant dining, Daily lunch menus, Weekly special dishes, Catering and party service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Meta Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based restaurant site with catering services.
  2. Compliant with GDPR via Complianz plugin and cookie consent banner.
  3. Uses Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking.
  4. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor 3.15.3 and Elementor Pro 3.15.1, indicating a modern CMS and page builder framework. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and several JavaScript libraries for UI effects and responsiveness. Hosting appears to be with rzone.de based on nameservers. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain, minimizing third-party dependencies except for Facebook Pixel. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive menus. The site uses Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie management, enhancing compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website with opportunities for performance and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elmelohergrill.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elmelohergrill.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.