Skip to main content

Security report for elkoep.bg

ЕЛКО ЕП България ООД · Energy · Bulgaria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ЕЛКО ЕП България ООД is a Bulgarian manufacturer specializing in electronic devices and intelligent wireless control systems for building automation. The company targets both end users and professional installers, offering a range of products including smart home automation, relays, switches, and configurators. Their market position is that of an established regional player with multiple international sites and a strong product portfolio. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery and Foundation, with integrations like Google Maps API and Smartsupp live chat, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements form protection and consent management for analytics and ads, but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with clear contact information and social media presence, but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elkoep.bg

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector focusing on smart building automation and wireless control systems. Their business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing electronic devices and smart home solutions. The presence of multiple language versions and international domains suggests a broad market reach. Key competitive advantages include proprietary product lines like iNELS and configurators that simplify product selection. The company maintains a partner ecosystem including smarthomebulgaria.bg and dgstudio.cz for support and web development. Revenue streams likely include product sales, technical support, and software tools. The target customers range from residential users to commercial building managers. Growth indicators include active content updates and new product launches. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy and security policies to align with evolving compliance requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices such as form protection and consent management for tracking disabled by default. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not disclosed. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting comprehensive security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security culture.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ЕЛКО ЕП България ООД
Description
Производител електронни устройства, системи безжично управление и интелигентни системи управление.
Key services
manufacturing electronic devices, wireless control systems, intelligent building automation, technical support, product configurators
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation framework, Google Maps API, Smartsupp live chat, Fancybox, Owl Carousel, Foundation Datepicker
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Consent management for analytics and ads disabled by default
  • Form protection script implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied by gtag)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartsupp
Marketing tools
Google Tag Manager (implied by gtag function)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Bulgarian language targeting local and regional customers.
  3. Multiple language options and international sites indicate a broad market presence.
  4. No explicit privacy policy found, but cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and UX.
  7. Security headers and policies are not explicitly visible in the HTML content.
  8. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information.
  9. Social media presence is active with Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn links.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and Google Maps API. The presence of Smartsupp live chat and custom form protection scripts indicates attention to user interaction and security. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and language localization. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and script management. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not visible. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible security headers and lack of published security policies. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack further and improve security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elkoep.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elkoep.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.