Skip to main content

Security report for elight.com

eEnergy · Energy · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eEnergy is a UK-based digital energy efficiency solutions provider focused on helping organizations eliminate energy waste and achieve Net Zero profitably. Their services include LED lighting upgrades, solar PV generation, EV charging infrastructure, energy analytics, and compliant financing options with no upfront costs. The company targets sectors such as education, healthcare, public sector, and commercial industries, positioning itself as a leading energy services provider with over 1,000 customers and numerous successful projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Hosting is on AWS with Cloudflare Bot Management enhancing security. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, secure session management, and bot protection. However, the site lacks a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR and cookie regulations. The business demonstrates credibility through certifications, customer testimonials, and media presence. Strategic recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and providing direct contact details for data protection officers or security teams.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elight.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eEnergy operates in the energy sector with a focus on digital energy efficiency and decarbonisation. Their competitive advantage lies in offering no upfront cost solutions that combine technology and financing to make Net Zero achievable and profitable. Revenue streams likely include service contracts for energy reduction, solar installations, EV charging, and analytics subscriptions. The target customers are medium to large organizations in education, healthcare, public, and commercial sectors. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by certifications and media endorsements. Growth indicators include over 1,200 completed projects and significant investment in energy efficiency. The company emphasizes trust, sustainability, and innovation in its market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare Bot Management, secure cookies, and comprehensive cookie consent management. Security headers are present, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contact information, and vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formal documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit contact information for the Data Protection Officer or privacy lead to enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eEnergy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eEnergy
Description
eEnergy provides digital energy efficiency solutions aimed at eliminating energy waste and reducing carbon emissions with no upfront cost. They focus on making Net Zero profitable and possible for organizations, especially in sectors like education, healthcare, public sector, and commercial & industrial.
Key services
LED lighting solutions, Solar PV generation, EV charging infrastructure, Energy analytics, Compliant financing and funding
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, CookieYes, Cloudflare Bot Management, Amazon Web Services (load balancing)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure session cookies (laravel_session, XSRF-TOKEN)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes
Marketing tools
Hotjar, CookieYes, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on energy efficiency and decarbonisation services.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories.
  4. Use of multiple trusted third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact via form.
  8. Multiple certifications and trust badges displayed.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for optimization, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Hotjar for user behavior insights, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by AWS with Cloudflare services for bot management and load balancing. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date libraries and no visible errors. Opportunities exist to enhance security documentation and incident response readiness. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elight.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elight.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.