Skip to main content

Security report for elgarissy.com

Elgarissy & Co · Finance · Israel

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elgarissy & Co is a specialized financial boutique firm based in Israel, offering unique accounting and financial services domestically and internationally. The company is managed by experienced professionals with strong expertise in accounting, financial consulting, and regulatory compliance. Their key services include support in mergers and acquisitions, IPO and capital raising processes, financial reporting, accounting consulting, due diligence, and outsourced financial services. The website targets businesses and individuals seeking high-level financial expertise. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted likely via GoDaddy, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protection flags set, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elgarissy.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm positions itself as a niche financial boutique with a focus on personalized, high-quality accounting and financial services. Their market positioning leverages the expertise of their partners, who have extensive experience in both public and private sectors. The business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate clients and investors requiring specialized financial advisory and accounting support. The website content and structure reflect a professional approach, with clear service offerings and contact channels. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or analytics tools, indicating a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The partnership ecosystem includes no explicit external partners beyond a web development company. Growth indicators are not directly visible but the domain age and content suggest a stable, established presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes protective status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers or updates. However, the absence of DNSSEC is a notable gap that could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor dedicated security contact channels. The contact form collects user data but lacks visible security assurances or privacy notices. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact information for reporting issues.
  5. Review and enhance the contact form with visible privacy notices and security assurances.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elgarissy & Co
Description
הפירמה מנוהלת על ידי רונן אלגריסי ואיגור פרנקלך. החזון שלנו הינו לספק ללקוחותינו שירותים פיננסיים ברמה המקצועית הגבוהה ביותר, יחס אישי וזמינות מירבית.
Key services
Liaison in mergers and acquisitions, Accounting support in IPO and capital raising processes, Financial report preparation, Accounting consulting and opinion writing, Accounting due diligence, Outsourced financial services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor page builder, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Photoswipe lightbox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Hebrew with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  6. No social media links detected in the content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Security headers and advanced security policies are not evident.
  9. Domain registration is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using popular plugins such as Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The use of Bootstrap CSS framework and jQuery libraries supports responsive and interactive design. Performance is moderate, with no evident major bottlenecks but potential for optimization. Accessibility features are present, including an accessibility toolbar with multiple options for users. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy, inferred from registrar and nameservers. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection beyond the contact form. The technical stack is stable but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elgarissy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elgarissy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.