Skip to main content

Security report for elektrum.ee

Elektrum Eesti OÜ · Energy · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elektrum Eesti OÜ is a well-established energy company operating in Estonia, offering a range of electricity packages, insurance, renewable energy solutions, and electric vehicle charging services. As part of the Latvenergo group, it holds a strong market position in the Baltic energy sector, serving both private and business customers with a focus on reliability and environmental sustainability. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear navigation, multi-language support, and comprehensive service information. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility, supported by consistent WHOIS data and transparent contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elektrum.ee

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elektrum operates in the energy and transport sectors, leveraging its parent company Latvenergo's extensive experience and infrastructure. Its business model combines energy retail with value-added services like insurance and EV charging, targeting a broad customer base in Estonia. The company shows growth orientation through partnerships (e.g., with Olerex) and innovation in product offerings. The website's content and structure support customer engagement and self-service, indicating a mature digital strategy. Social media channels and clear contact points enhance customer trust and brand visibility. The absence of privacy protection in WHOIS and consistent registrant data reinforce legitimacy. The company is positioned as a leading energy provider with a strong regional footprint and commitment to sustainability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable CMP (Usercentrics), supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting potential enhancement opportunities. The integration of third-party scripts is standard but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing formal security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Elektrum Eesti OÜ
VAT number
EE101170952
Registration number
11399985
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elektrum Eesti OÜ
Description
Elektrum Eesti OÜ is an energy company operating in Estonia, part of the Latvenergo group, providing electricity packages, insurance, renewable energy, and electric vehicle charging solutions. They serve private and business clients with a focus on reliable, environmentally friendly energy solutions and innovative services.
Key services
Electricity packages, Insurance services, Renewable energy products, Electric vehicle charging solutions, Customer self-service portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, WhosOn chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Usercentrics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login links

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Estonian with multi-language support.
  3. Clear business and contact information is provided.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools is evident.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, CSS stylesheets, and integration of third-party services for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and touch device detection. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not explicit but the use of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of explicit security headers and incident response mechanisms could pose operational risks if not addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elektrum.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elektrum.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.