Skip to main content

Security report for elavon.eu

U.S. Bank Europe DAC trading as Elavon Merchant Services · Finance · Ireland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elavon Europe, operated by U.S. Bank Europe DAC, is a prominent payment processing and merchant services provider targeting businesses across Europe. The company is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and other UK financial authorities, underscoring its legitimacy and compliance with financial regulations. The website serves as a regional portal offering multi-language support and links to country-specific domains, facilitating localized payment solutions. The business model focuses on enabling merchants to accept payments efficiently, with a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and customer service. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Video.js, and Slick Carousel for enhanced user experience. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing purposes, with a clear cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting good privacy practices. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility basics, although some improvements in accessibility could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers in the HTML content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a security.txt or explicit incident response contact is a minor gap. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected under EURid, which is typical for European domains and justified given the financial nature of the business. Overall, Elavon Europe presents a professional, secure, and compliant online presence suitable for its enterprise-scale financial services. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elavon.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elavon Europe operates as a key player in the European payment processing market, leveraging its parent company U.S. Bank Europe DAC's regulatory standing. The company targets business customers requiring reliable merchant services across multiple European countries, supported by localized websites and language options. Its competitive advantage lies in regulatory compliance, multi-country support, and integration with global payment networks. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, monthly service fees, and value-added services. The partnership ecosystem includes regional domains and payment platforms such as Opayo. The company's digital presence reflects a mature, enterprise-grade operation with a focus on compliance and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No direct contact information for incident response or vulnerability disclosure was found, indicating a potential gap in transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is managed with consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or dedicated security page with incident response contact details to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users and compliance with legal requirements.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices, ensuring ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
U.S. Bank Europe DAC
Registration number
BR022122
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
U.S. Bank Europe DAC trading as Elavon Merchant Services
Description
Helping thousands of customers around the world grow their business through payments.
Key services
Payment processing, Merchant services, Multi-country payment solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Video.js, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and relevant to payment processing services
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube
  6. Use of modern web technologies and Adobe Experience Manager CMS
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  8. WHOIS data is privacy protected and not publicly available
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No adult or explicit content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, indicating a strong technical foundation. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Video.js, and Slick Carousel for interactive content and media handling. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing, with a cookie consent mechanism to manage user privacy preferences. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for moderate performance. However, the absence of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but likely managed by a reputable provider given the enterprise nature.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elavon.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elavon.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.