Skip to main content

Security report for ekonomie.sk

Media · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ekonomie.sk is a Slovak online media platform specializing in business, finance, investment news, and advice. The website operates on WordPress using the Newspaper theme and targets a general audience interested in business news. The business model appears to be content publishing supported by advertising. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, DNSSEC, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring a baseline of security and analytics capabilities. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information, which are important for compliance and trust. The security posture is moderate with good SSL configuration but missing some best practices. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekonomie.sk

This scan found 33 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ekonomie.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ekonomie.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche regional media outlet focused on business and finance news in Slovakia. It leverages content publishing as its primary service, with external links to various related media and lifestyle sites, suggesting a partnership or advertising ecosystem. The domain is relatively new (2022) but consistent with the business profile. The site lacks detailed business information such as company registration or VAT numbers, which limits transparency. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking for marketing purposes. The site’s content and design quality are basic, suitable for a small media outlet.

Security posture

The site benefits from HTTPS and DNSSEC, which are strong indicators of secure domain and transport layers. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in security maturity. Forms present (login and password recovery) do not show advanced security features in the HTML snippet. The site should improve its security posture by adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response readiness.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online media platform providing news and articles focused on business, finance, investments, and advice.
Key services
News articles, Business insights, Investment advice
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
td-composer (Newspaper theme)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based media platform focused on business and finance news.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Social media links are not explicitly present in the main HTML but many external domains linked are media or related sites.
  5. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. HTTPS and DNSSEC are enabled, indicating good baseline security.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content.
  10. Site uses a commercial WordPress theme (Newspaper) with standard plugins.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Newspaper theme and uses jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern fonts and CSS. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. The site uses DNSSEC and HTTPS, indicating good domain and transport security. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekonomie.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekonomie.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.