Skip to main content

Security report for ekofondspp.sk

Ekofond SPP, n.o. · Energy · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ekofond SPP is a Slovak non-profit organization dedicated to environmental sustainability, carbon footprint reduction, and social responsibility. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform focused on promoting environmental projects and educational initiatives. The organization has an established market presence since 2007 and targets a general audience interested in energy and sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR, with clear privacy and cookie policies. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing terms of service and incident response contacts, and improving accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekofondspp.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as an essential non-profit entity in the energy and environmental sector in Slovakia. It leverages partnerships and social media channels to engage its audience and promote its initiatives. The business model focuses on funding environmental projects and raising public awareness through educational content. The website content and structure support its mission effectively, with clear navigation and relevant information. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, possibly via social media or contact forms not detected in the HTML. The organization maintains a consistent brand image and demonstrates trust signals through privacy compliance and cookie management.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories, allowing users to control tracking preferences. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but is managed via consent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ekofond SPP, n.o.
Description
Ekofond SPP is a non-profit organization focused on reducing carbon footprint and strengthening environmental and social responsibility. It acts as a reliable partner contributing to sustainable development conditions.
Key services
Environmental projects funding, Educational campaigns, Public awareness initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Contact information is limited to social media and footer links; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on environmental non-profit activities.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, providing a detailed and user-friendly interface. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS detected. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport tags but lacks extensive metadata or structured data beyond cookie consent. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles in cookie consent modals but could be improved. Hosting provider and server details are not explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 45/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekofondspp.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekofondspp.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.