Skip to main content

Security report for eklers.lv

SIA "Arseja" · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eklers is a local hospitality business operating a popular café and confectionery in Sigulda, Latvia. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their offerings including fresh local food, custom cakes, and event catering services. The business targets general consumers in the local area seeking quality café and confectionery products. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, incorporating modern web technologies and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and technical implementation but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eklers.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eklers operates in the hospitality sector as a small local business focused on café and confectionery services. Their market position is that of a well-liked local establishment in Sigulda, offering fresh daily products and custom orders for special occasions. The business model centers on direct retail and event catering. The website supports customer engagement through contact forms and social media channels, indicating active customer interaction. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with digitalflex.co for website development and tourism.sigulda.lv for local tourism promotion suggests a supportive ecosystem. Growth indicators are not explicit but the professional online presence and event services suggest a stable local market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting user input forms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, which could hinder timely security issue management. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality business but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Arseja"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Arseja"
Description
Viesmīlīga kafejnīca un konditoreja pašā Siguldas centrā! Piedāvājumā salāti, zupas un citi siltie ēdieni, kā arī, protams, visu iemīļotās smalkmaizītes un kūciņas. Pēc individuāla pasūtījuma arī gatavojam dažādus gardumus - kombinētās uzkodu plates, kliņģerus un debešķīgas vairākstāvu tortes.
Key services
café dining, confectionery products, custom cake orders, event catering and banquet services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap, Fusion Builder plugin, Avada theme
Frameworks
Fusion Builder, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Avada theme and Fusion Builder.
  2. Content is focused on a local café and confectionery business in Sigulda, Latvia.
  3. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly provided.
  4. Multiple contact forms with Google reCAPTCHA are implemented for orders and event inquiries.
  5. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter with official pages linked.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder plugin, leveraging jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for spam protection on forms. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible by optimizing images and scripts. Accessibility is basic, with room for enhancements to meet best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from security and compliance upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eklers.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eklers.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.