Skip to main content

Security report for eighty-days.com

80 DAYS · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

80 DAYS is a well-established, award-winning creative and digital marketing agency specializing in the hospitality and travel sectors. Founded in 2002 and operating from multiple offices including Edinburgh, London, Málaga, and Dubai, the company serves a global clientele of respected hotel and travel brands. Their service offerings encompass brand development, website creation, digital marketing, social media management, training, and insights, positioning them as a comprehensive partner in travel marketing. The company holds notable certifications such as the King's Award for Enterprise 2025, B Corp certification, and is a Google Premier Partner for over a decade, underscoring their market credibility and expertise. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Visual Website Optimizer, Agile CRM, and Cloudflare for security and performance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, bot management, CSRF protection, and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a mature security posture. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed, representing an area for improvement. The website exhibits extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, with comprehensive cookie and privacy policies aligned with GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly presented, including verified company email, phone number, and physical address. Despite the absence of WHOIS registration data, the overall digital presence and business information support the legitimacy of the entity. The site content is professional, safe, and targeted at a general audience within the hospitality and travel marketing industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eighty-days.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

80 DAYS occupies a strong position in the hospitality and travel marketing niche, leveraging long-standing industry experience and multiple prestigious certifications to differentiate itself. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end creative and digital marketing services tailored to hotel and travel brands, enabling diversified revenue streams from branding, digital campaigns, social media, and consultancy. The company’s multi-office presence indicates geographic diversification and a broad market reach. Strategic partnerships with Google and recognition through awards enhance their competitive advantage. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to client services. Growth indicators include recent awards and sustained Google Premier Partner status. The company’s ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms like LinkedIn, Instagram, and Twitter, facilitating broad digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security best practices implemented, including Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection, Cloudflare-based bot management, and CSRF tokens for form submissions. The presence of a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy indicates compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing is balanced with privacy considerations. To enhance security maturity, the company should consider publishing explicit security policies, incident response procedures, and a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and explicitly declare security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance GDPR compliance transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Occupancy Marketing Ltd
Registration number
SC360835
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
80 DAYS
Description
80 DAYS is an award-winning, full service creative and digital marketing agency that specialises in hospitality, working with some of the world's most respected hotel and travel brands.
Key services
Brand, Websites, Digital Marketing, Social Media, Training, Insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Agile CRM, ShareThis, Cloudflare (rate limiting and bot management), Microsoft Clarity, Vimeo Analytics, YouTube embeds
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Bot management via Cloudflare
  • CSRF protection via ASP.NET __RequestVerificationToken cookie
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Vimeo Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Microsoft Advertising (Bing)
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Visual Website Optimizer, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Agile CRM, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on hospitality and travel marketing sector
  3. Multiple offices and clear company registration details provided
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  7. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual for established business
  8. No signs of malicious or adult content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack incorporating Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Visual Website Optimizer, Agile CRM, and Cloudflare services, ensuring robust marketing, analytics, and security capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured data. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints. There is no explicit CMS detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements in security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eighty-days.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eighty-days.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.