Skip to main content

Security report for ehsanalytics.com

EHS Analytics · Energy · Canada

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EHS Analytics is a Canadian company specializing in data solutions and enterprise AI for occupational and process safety. They provide services and products including intelligent data collection, safety data warehouses, safety outcomes and insights, and predictive analytics, targeting industries such as forestry, construction, manufacturing, and energy. Their market position is that of a leading Canadian provider in safety data analytics, supported by a professional and content-rich website. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging modern marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though lacking explicit security headers and incident response disclosures. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trustworthiness and suggests the need for domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its B2B audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ehsanalytics.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B model focused on safety data analytics and AI-driven insights for Canadian industries with high safety requirements. Their competitive advantage lies in proprietary machine learning models and comprehensive data solutions tailored to occupational safety. Revenue likely derives from consulting services, software products, and analytics platforms. The target customers are medium to large organizations in energy, manufacturing, construction, and forestry sectors. The company maintains a professional online presence with published white papers and active social media channels, indicating growth orientation and thought leadership. Partnerships with HubSpot and marketing agencies support their digital strategy. The absence of WHOIS data is a risk factor but does not currently undermine their market credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages were found, limiting transparency on security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and policy disclosures to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit privacy compliance and cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EHS Analytics
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EHS Analytics
Description
EHS Analytics is a Canadian company specializing in data solutions for process and occupational safety, offering expertise in data structuring, contractor data acquisition, analytics, and proprietary machine learning models. They serve industries including forestry, construction, manufacturing, and energy, helping organizations extract insights from safety data, identify trends, and streamline reporting.
Key services
Intelligent Data Collection, Safety Data Warehouse, Safety Outcomes & Insights, Safety Analytics Consulting, Dashboard Design, Predictive Analytics, Research & Analysis, Integrations & Data Pipelines
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, jQuery 1.7.1, HubSpot Web Interactives, HubSpot Analytics, HubSpot Cookie Banner
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS Framework
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing Tools
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
  3. Strong focus on safety data analytics and AI solutions for Canadian industries
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  7. Contact information includes physical address and company email
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram
  9. Uses HubSpot CMS and marketing/analytics tools
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing HubSpot's marketing and analytics tools alongside Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The HTML is valid and well-structured, with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by third-party scripts and HubSpot platform overhead. The site uses jQuery 1.7.1, which is an older version and could be updated for security and performance. The technical stack supports a professional B2B SaaS marketing approach but could benefit from modernization of JavaScript libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ehsanalytics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ehsanalytics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.