Skip to main content

Security report for egt-gebaeudetechnik.de

EGT Gebäudetechnik GmbH · Energy · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EGT Gebäudetechnik GmbH is a well-established German company specializing in electrical installations and building technology services, with over 25 years of experience and more than 6,000 projects completed. The company serves industrial, commercial, public, and private clients across Germany, operating from multiple locations. Their key services include electrical installation, security technology, KNX systems, CAD planning, thermography, and maintenance services. The website reflects a professional business presence with consistent branding and clear contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching egt-gebaeudetechnik.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leading provider in the energy and building technology sector, leveraging a service-oriented business model focused on comprehensive project execution. Their market presence is supported by a broad portfolio of services and a stable customer base, including long-term clients. The cross-domain cookie consent indicates a network of related businesses, suggesting a partnership ecosystem. The company targets industrial and commercial clients primarily, with a medium-sized workforce and significant annual revenue, indicating a solid market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is transparent and consent-managed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and document a security policy and incident response procedures with clear contact channels.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and usability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EGT Gebäudetechnik GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EGT Gebäudetechnik GmbH
Description
Die EGT Gebäudetechnik GmbH ist ein führendes Unternehmen im Bereich Stark- und Schwachstrominstallationen, tätig deutschlandweit in der elektro- und informationstechnischen Gebäudeausrüstung für Industrie, Gewerbe, öffentliche Einrichtungen und Privatkunden.
Key services
Elektroinstallation, Sicherheitstechnik/Brandmeldetechnik, EIB/KNX Anlagen, CAD-Planung, Thermografie, Service und Wartung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog Browser Agent
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern cookie consent management.
  2. Multiple company locations and contact details provided.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  5. Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts are present.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No incident response or security contact information found.
  8. Business information is clear and consistent with domain and WHOIS data.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates modern tools like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and a moderate performance profile. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The technical stack is stable and suitable for the business scale, though opportunities exist for modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with egt-gebaeudetechnik.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review egt-gebaeudetechnik.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.