Skip to main content

Security report for efrata.gr

efrata · Media · Greece

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

efrata is a communication consulting and public relations firm based in Greece, established in 2022 and partnered with Finn Partners. The company offers a broad range of services including corporate communication, media relations, crisis management, public affairs, and digital marketing. Their market position is that of a specialized small business serving diverse industries such as consumer goods, automotive, and technology. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, optimized for mobile and SEO, and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Security posture is solid but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers like Content-Security-Policy. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR explicit statements. Contact information is clearly provided, including email, phone, and physical address, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching efrata.gr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

efrata operates in the media and telecommunications sectors, focusing on communication consulting and public relations. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate clients requiring strategic communication programs. The partnership with Finn Partners and membership in EDEE strengthen their market credibility. The company leverages digital channels and social media to enhance client outreach. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting contracts and communication campaigns. The website indicates a growth-oriented approach with case studies and a diverse client portfolio. The firm maintains ISO 9001 certification, signaling quality management commitment. Their digital presence is supported by modern CMS and marketing tools, positioning them competitively in the Greek market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented to protect forms from spam and abuse. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain hijacking protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. No Content-Security-Policy header or security.txt file is detected, representing gaps in defense-in-depth and vulnerability disclosure. The site uses reputable plugins and frameworks but should ensure timely updates to avoid vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were found. Incident response contact channels are not publicly listed, which could be improved for transparency and security readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and contact information.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve privacy compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerability risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
efrata
Registration number
8507101000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
efrata
Description
efrata is a communication and public relations company, partner of Finn Partners, member of EDEE, offering comprehensive communication programs including corporate strategy, public relations, and public affairs. It serves clients in consumer goods, automotive, and technology sectors.
Key services
Corporate Communication, Media Relations, Crisis Management, Public Affairs, Reputation Management, Digital, SEO & Social Media, Internal Communication, Creative & Digital Services, Monitor & Measure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Poppins), Contact Form 7, Embed Any Document, Jetpack, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
PHP (WordPress backend)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA, Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration.
  4. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  6. Privacy policy is present but basic and not explicitly GDPR compliant.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn.
  10. ISO 9001 certification displayed as trust indicator.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution for content presentation. It uses Google Fonts (Open Sans and Poppins) and integrates Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but uses custom name servers (ns1.mynewserver.com, ns2.mynewserver.com). Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS/JS assets. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers and DNS security enhancements are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with efrata.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review efrata.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.