Skip to main content

Security report for eframe.se

eframe.se · Media · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

32/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eframe.se is a small Swedish-language blog website publishing diverse articles primarily focused on IPTV troubleshooting, event planning, lifestyle, and product guides. The site uses WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The technical setup is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced security configurations. Security posture is limited, with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or privacy policies present, exposing potential compliance and security risks. The domain is privacy-protected and recently registered, with some content dated in the future, which may affect trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and business transparency to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eframe.se

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eframe.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eframe.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a content publishing platform targeting Swedish-speaking users interested in IPTV and lifestyle topics. It likely monetizes through indirect means such as advertising or affiliate marketing, though no explicit monetization tools are detected. The business model is typical for small blogs with no clear parent company or subsidiaries. The lack of contact information and privacy policies limits business credibility. The site’s market position is niche with moderate content quality and branding consistency. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance adherence.

Security posture

The security maturity of eframe.se is low to moderate. While HTTPS is enforced, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options increases risk exposure. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses standard WordPress plugins but does not show evidence of advanced security controls or monitoring. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and would benefit from implementing security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish contact information and establish incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve trust and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eframe.se
Description
A blog-style website publishing articles on various topics including IPTV troubleshooting, event planning, lifestyle, and product guides.
Key services
Informational blog articles, Guides and how-tos
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Elementor, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress blog with multiple articles in Swedish.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. Uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. No visible security or incident response policies.
  7. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  8. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin but lacks privacy compliance.
  9. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond WordPress defaults.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Elementor for content management and SEO optimization. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for background images and responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic with some screen reader text present. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced security headers and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eframe.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eframe.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.