Skip to main content

Security report for efp.clinic

Enhanced Fertility · Healthcare · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enhanced Fertility is a healthcare technology company providing a digital platform that leverages proprietary AI and remote diagnostics to accelerate accurate fertility diagnosis and data-driven treatment. The platform targets fertility clinics and patients, aiming to improve clinical decision-making and treatment outcomes. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce, supporting multiple languages and integrating marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and HubSpot. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the platform demonstrates a solid technical foundation and credible business presence in the fertility healthcare sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching efp.clinic

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
73
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an innovative fertility care provider using AI to process complex health data combinations. Its business model revolves around a virtual platform for clinicians and patients, supported by an advisory board of clinicians and clinical research. The target market includes fertility clinics and patients globally, addressing a significant unmet need in infertility treatment access. The website's multi-language support and integration with referral forms indicate a focus on user engagement and lead generation. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for startups in healthcare. The company appears to be a small but growing player in the digital health space with a focus on fertility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain transfer protection, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and HubSpot are present, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enhanced Fertility
Description
A digital platform that speeds up time to an accurate diagnosis and the start of data-driven fertility treatment using proprietary AI and virtual platform for clinicians and patients.
Key services
Proprietary AI processing health data, Virtual platform for clinical decision making, Rapid referral forms, Remote diagnostics and data-driven treatment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of privacy protection for WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional fertility care platform using AI and digital tools.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page content.
  4. Uses WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce plugins.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and HubSpot tracking scripts.
  6. No advanced security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and long domain expiry.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Multiple language versions available via TranslatePress plugin.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Analytics, HubSpot marketing and analytics tools, and uses Cloudflare DNS services. The site is multi-lingual via TranslatePress plugin. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by All in One SEO and Yoast SEO plugins with structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a healthcare digital platform but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with efp.clinic. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review efp.clinic.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.