Skip to main content

Security report for eforto.com

Eforto · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eforto is a healthcare-focused company providing validated solutions for monitoring muscle health and vitality capacity, leveraging grip strength and muscle fatigability as key biomarkers. Their offerings include a medical-grade vigorimeter device, a guided self-testing mobile app, and remote monitoring metrics designed for fitness, medical, and clinical research sectors. The website is professionally designed, hosted on HubSpot CMS, and integrates scientific references and testimonials to establish credibility. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance documentation. Contact information and incident response details are not explicitly provided, which may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical and content quality but requires improvements in privacy, transparency, and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eforto.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eforto positions itself as a niche player in the healthcare technology sector, focusing on muscle health monitoring aligned with WHO vitality capacity definitions. Their business model revolves around selling medical devices and software solutions for self and clinical monitoring. The company targets fitness enthusiasts, healthcare providers, and clinical researchers, leveraging partnerships with research institutions as indicated by logos on the site. The presence of scientific publications and validated protocols suggests a strong research-driven approach. However, the lack of clear company registration and contact details may hinder trust among potential customers and partners. The website's integration with HubSpot indicates use of modern marketing and analytics tools, supporting growth and customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses secure form submissions, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML, reflecting a solid baseline security posture. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or security.txt files was found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, while the site is secure in basic terms, enhancements are needed to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance transparency and user trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eforto
Description
Eforto provides a validated solution to monitor muscle health and vitality capacity through grip strength and muscle fatigability measurements. It supports fitness, medical, and clinical research sectors with precise biomarker insights and remote monitoring capabilities.
Key services
Muscle strength monitoring, Muscle fatigability assessment, Self perceived fatigue measurement, Remote monitoring with insightful metrics, Validated testing protocols
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Slick Slider, Google Fonts
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot marketing tools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on muscle health monitoring.
  2. Content is rich with scientific references and validated protocols.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, raising questions about domain registration status.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Social media links present but URLs are placeholders (#0).
  8. Site uses HubSpot CMS and analytics tools.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies including Slick Slider and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content such as videos and images. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are present but could be improved for better compliance. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but likely HubSpot managed hosting. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eforto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eforto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.