Skip to main content

Security report for efentwell.ch

EFW! · Media · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EFW! is a small Swiss creative agency specializing in concept and creation services including video production, graphic design, illustration, and corporate identity development. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking professional multimedia content and creative design solutions. Their portfolio showcases diverse projects such as music videos, TV spots, and film productions, positioning them as a niche player in the media industry. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins for content management and media display, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service, though a cookie consent banner is present. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching efentwell.ch

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EFW! operates as a creative agency in the media sector, focusing on multimedia production and design services. Their business model revolves around project-based creative services for clients requiring video, graphic, and illustrative content. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Vimeo, supporting marketing and client engagement. The website content and portfolio indicate a focus on quality and diverse media projects, which may provide competitive advantages in the Swiss creative market. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information suggests a small-scale operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website. Growth indicators include a regularly updated portfolio and active social channels. Strategic observations recommend enhancing privacy and security disclosures to build greater client trust and comply with regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Forms are minimal and do not appear to collect sensitive information beyond search queries. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing additional headers, formal security policies, and regular security audits to mitigate risks and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance analytics and tracking transparency by disclosing data collection practices and retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EFW!
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EFW!
Description
EFW! is a creative agency specializing in concept and creation, offering services in video production, graphic design, illustration, and corporate identity. They showcase a portfolio of multimedia projects including music videos, TV spots, and film productions.
Key services
Video production, Graphic design, Illustration, Corporate identity (CI/CD)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Twenty20 plugin, Video Embed Thumbnail Generator
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for media and page building.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Vimeo.
  6. No security policy or incident response information available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. Website content is focused on creative media production and design services.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins including WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and Twenty20 for media presentation. The tech stack includes PHP and jQuery, typical for WordPress sites. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts, Typekit, and Gravatar, indicating reliance on third-party services for fonts and avatars. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators but the site is mobile responsive and accessible at a basic level. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains a clean and professional design. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of security headers. Modernization opportunities include adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and improving SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with efentwell.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review efentwell.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.