Skip to main content

Security report for edwardjames.com

Edward James · Media · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edward James operates a niche adult entertainment website specializing in black gay bareback pornographic content. The business model is subscription and pay-per-view based, targeting adult consumers interested in this genre. The company has a long domain history dating back to 1999, indicating established market presence. The site is powered by modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and uses Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Payment processing is handled by authorized third-party agents such as Epoch and Segpay, enhancing transactional trust. However, privacy compliance is basic with minimal policies and no cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edwardjames.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a premium content provider in the adult media sector, focusing on a specific niche to differentiate from competitors. Revenue streams include membership subscriptions and individual video purchases. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and affiliate programs, supporting monetization and marketing. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, appealing to its target audience. Growth indicators include regular content updates and featured models. The business operates under Customer Care Corp, with a physical address in Las Vegas, USA, adding legitimacy. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security policies to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no explicit GDPR compliance beyond a basic privacy policy. The use of secure forms with hidden tokens is a positive practice. Overall, the security culture could be strengthened by adopting industry best practices and enhancing user trust through visible security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish an incident response and security policy page to demonstrate preparedness and build trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Customer Care Corp
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Edward James
Description
Edward James is an iconic producer and filmmaker known for bringing the hottest, horniest, most hung black guys together for wild intense orgies. The site offers black on black bareback gay porn content including videos and photos.
Key services
Premium HD videos, Exclusive photos, Membership access, Mobile and tablet optimized content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with hidden fields and tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform specializing in black gay bareback porn.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. Site uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are minimal; cookie consent is missing.
  5. Security headers are not detected; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with a reseller registrar.
  7. Payment processing is handled by third-party authorized agents.
  8. Social media presence on Twitter is linked.
  9. Site includes membership benefits and subscription model.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered around Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. Hosting on AWS provides scalable infrastructure. Analytics integration with Matomo and Google Tag Manager allows detailed user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses popular font libraries and icon sets. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading of CSS assets. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and SEO further. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom-built platform tailored to the business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edwardjames.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edwardjames.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.