Skip to main content

Security report for ednetze.de

naturenergie netze · Energy · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

naturenergie netze is a regional utility network operator based in Südbaden, Germany, providing essential services in electricity, water, lighting, communication technology, and training. The company operates as part of the Energiedienst-Gruppe, targeting customers and partners in the energy and utility sectors. The website is professionally designed using TYPO3 CMS, with good content quality and clear navigation tailored to its audience. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and is hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS, indicating a reliable hosting environment. The site incorporates accessibility features and is optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly documented. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with moderate tracking and marketing tools, balanced with user privacy considerations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ednetze.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ednetze.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ednetze.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a regional network operator within the energy sector, supported by its parent group Energiedienst-Gruppe. Its business model focuses on infrastructure operation and service provision across multiple utilities including electricity, water, and communication. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear focus on regional customers and partners. The presence of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools suggests active engagement in digital marketing and customer insights. The partnership with ednetze.de and use of reputable cookie consent and accessibility tools indicate a well-integrated ecosystem and commitment to compliance and user experience.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of cookie consent for privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness visibility. There is no security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism found, which could be improved to enhance trust and security culture. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
naturenergie netze
Description
Ihr Netzbetreiber in Südbaden. Wir bieten Ihnen eine Vielzahl von Dienstleistungen in den Bereichen Strom, Wasser, Beleuchtung, Kommunikation und Schulungen.
Key services
electricity network operation, water supply network, lighting services, communication technology, training and education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript, CSS, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, eyeAble accessibility tool
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend assets
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts present with user consent
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content; contact likely via form
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. Website content is in German and targets regional customers in Südbaden, Germany
  8. Accessibility features included via eyeAble tool
  9. Hosting DNS via Microsoft Azure DNS nameservers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging modern CSS and JavaScript assets with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. Hosting is via Microsoft Azure DNS, indicating a robust infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical CSS and modular JavaScript. Accessibility is enhanced by integration of the eyeAble tool, and SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Technical risks are low, but the absence of some security headers and public security documentation represents an area for improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and compliant online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ednetze.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ednetze.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.