Skip to main content

Security report for editorandpublisher.com

Editor and Publisher · Media · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Editor and Publisher is a well-established media industry news platform focused on newspapers, news publishing, and journalism. It provides exclusive reporting, industry news, commentary, print editions, job listings, and awards recognition. The website targets media professionals and stakeholders in the news publishing sector, operating primarily on an advertising-supported model with subscription elements for print editions. Technically, the site uses a mix of legacy and modern technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, AMP, and integrates multiple third-party advertising and analytics services. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data for SEO enhancement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some security best practices, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching editorandpublisher.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a strong position in the media industry niche, serving as a key information source for news media professionals. Its business model leverages advertising networks and subscription-based print editions. The presence of partner domains related to job boards and digital magazine distribution indicates a diversified ecosystem. The site’s content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a medium-sized business profile. Growth indicators include active content updates, multimedia integration, and industry event promotion. Strategic partnerships with advertising and analytics providers enhance revenue streams and audience insights.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and the site uses Google reCAPTCHA and Facebook SDK with secure attributes. However, the absence of key security headers and lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicate gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing security contact information. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including security and general business contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Editor and Publisher
Description
Editor and Publisher is a media industry news website providing news, exclusive reporting, commentary, industry events, job listings, and print editions related to newspapers, news publishing, and journalism.
Key services
Exclusive reporting, Industry news, Commentary and opinion, Print magazine editions, Job listings, Industry events, Awards and recognition programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Bootstrap 3.1.1, Font Awesome 4.4.0, AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) runtime, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Broadstreet Ads, Pico Tools, Revive Adserver
Frameworks
Bootstrap, AMP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Use of Facebook SDK with crossorigin attribute
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Bombora
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Broadstreet Ads, Revive Adserver
Tracking pixels
Bombora, Broadstreet Ads
Marketing tools
CloudEngage, Pico Tools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional media industry news portal with extensive content and multimedia
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts are used
  4. Social media presence is integrated with official Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn links
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  7. Site uses AMP for mobile optimization and includes structured data for SEO
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure combines legacy libraries like jQuery 1.11.0 with modern frameworks such as AMP and Bootstrap 3.1.1. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and marketing, including Google Analytics, Bombora, Broadstreet Ads, and Pico Tools. The site is mobile-optimized using AMP and responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by updating legacy scripts and optimizing ad loading. The CMS is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. SEO is supported by structured data and meta tags. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts and lack of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with editorandpublisher.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review editorandpublisher.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.