Skip to main content

Security report for edgeautonomy.io

Edge Autonomy · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edge Autonomy is a technology company specializing in multi-mission capabilities for uncrewed aircraft, advanced ISR optics, and resilient energy solutions. Founded in 2021, the company positions itself as an innovator with over three decades of combined experience, targeting government and defense sectors with advanced reconnaissance and surveillance technologies. The website reflects a professional B2B business model with a focus on high-tech solutions and rugged power systems. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Gravity Forms, with integrated analytics and consent management tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cookiebot. The infrastructure is hosted likely via GoDaddy, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved and formal security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partial, with a strong cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgeautonomy.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Edge Autonomy operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on defense and government clients requiring uncrewed aircraft and ISR optics. The company leverages advanced technology to deliver resilient energy and surveillance solutions. Its market positioning is that of a specialized technology provider with a niche focus on multi-mission capabilities. The business model is B2B, targeting institutional customers. The website indicates a small-sized company founded recently but with experienced leadership. The company maintains an active social media presence across major platforms, enhancing its market visibility. The lack of direct contact information on the website suggests a controlled communication approach, typical for defense-related firms. The use of privacy protection in domain registration aligns with industry norms for security and privacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with GDPR cookie requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. The site uses modern libraries and frameworks with no known vulnerable versions detected. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Edge Autonomy
Description
Edge Autonomy multi-mission capabilities address unique challenges for uncrewed aircraft, advanced ISR optics, and resilient energy solutions.
Key services
Uncrewed aircraft systems, Advanced ISR optics, Resilient energy solutions, Long-range reconnaissance, Optical surveillance systems, Rugged power solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Hotjar
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Gravity Forms
  2. Cookie consent managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or linked pages
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (X), LinkedIn, and YouTube
  6. Website content is focused on advanced technology solutions for uncrewed aircraft and energy sectors
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  8. HTTPS is enforced with no visible mixed content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with Hotjar for user behavior analytics. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, providing granular control over cookie categories. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and Ionic Framework. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage schema. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy, consistent with WHOIS data. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgeautonomy.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgeautonomy.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.