Skip to main content

Security report for edgarpayneartwork.com

Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.edgarpayneartwork.com presents itself as a Japanese language health supplement site focused on anemia and iron supplementation, targeting primarily women experiencing anemia symptoms. The site promotes a specific iron supplement product with nutritional benefits and natural ingredients. The business model appears to be affiliate marketing or direct promotion of health supplements, with additional links to related health and beauty products. The site content is basic and lacks comprehensive business or contact information. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO features are minimal. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or advanced protections. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and contact information is limited to a contact form without emails or phone numbers. From a security perspective, the site lacks important security headers and privacy compliance measures, which reduces trustworthiness. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which is suspicious for an active commercial website. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present, indicating user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the site scores moderately low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, contact transparency, and domain legitimacy verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgarpayneartwork.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the healthcare sector focusing on nutritional supplements for anemia. It targets a niche market of women with anemia symptoms, leveraging affiliate marketing or direct product promotion. The business model relies on content marketing and external affiliate links to monetize traffic. The site lacks clear company information, certifications, or trust signals, which may limit competitive advantage. The external links suggest partnerships or affiliate relationships with various unrelated domains. Growth potential depends on improving trust, compliance, and expanding content quality. The absence of registrant data and domain legitimacy concerns may impact business credibility and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low to moderate. HTTPS is enabled, which is a basic requirement, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are implemented. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, GDPR compliance, or incident response contacts. The site uses tracking scripts without transparent privacy disclosures. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration information raises legitimacy concerns. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of security best practices and compliance measures represents a risk. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not present.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Add verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and business credibility.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website promotes a health supplement focused on anemia prevention and iron supplementation, targeting primarily women experiencing anemia symptoms. It emphasizes nutritional benefits and natural ingredients in the supplement.
Key services
Health supplement promotion, Affiliate linking to related health and beauty products
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is in Japanese focused on anemia supplements targeting women.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to a contact form only; no emails or phone numbers provided.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is basic.
  6. Multiple external links to unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising related.
  7. Tracking script from Research Artisan Pro is present indicating user tracking.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is suspicious.
  9. Website design and content quality is basic with limited professionalism and trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site loads moderate performance but lacks advanced optimization techniques. There is no detected hosting provider information or CDN usage. The site includes a third-party tracking script from Research Artisan Pro, indicating user behavior tracking. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance. The site structure is simple with limited navigation and content depth. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and implement security best practices to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgarpayneartwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgarpayneartwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.