Skip to main content

Security report for eddie-ozzie.com

Access Intelligence, LLC. · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Eddie & Ozzie Awards website represents a prestigious industry recognition program operated by Access Intelligence, LLC. It targets publishing professionals and media companies, offering awards in editorial and design excellence. The site is well-structured, content-rich, and professionally designed, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, it leverages WordPress CMS with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates advanced analytics and consent management tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Osano CMP. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site demonstrates strong compliance with privacy regulations and offers a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eddie-ozzie.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on award programs and event management. Its market position is strong within the publishing community, with a broad target audience including associations, B2B, consumer, and content marketing publications globally. Revenue is primarily generated through entry fees and sponsorships. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and trust signals such as testimonials and privacy compliance. Partnerships with Access Intelligence and use of secure platforms for entry management indicate a robust operational ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and integration of a reputable consent management platform. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are absent, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain trust and transparency.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Description
FOLIO’s Eddie & Ozzie Awards is the most prestigious recognition program in the publishing community, recognizing excellence in editorial content and design across print and digital media. It celebrates editorial and design excellence with awards in multiple categories for publications worldwide.
Key services
Award recognition program, Event hosting (annual awards gala), Industry benchmarking and recognition
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.2, jQuery, Bootstrap, Osano Consent Management Platform, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Osano CMP
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Parsely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Parsely
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed award program site for the Eddie & Ozzie Awards.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and includes detailed award categories, FAQs, testimonials, and event information.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with Osano CMP integration.
  4. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.2 with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Osano CMP for cookie consent and integrates Google Analytics and Parsely for analytics tracking. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. Structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for SEO benefits. Some inline scripts and external libraries are used, including New Relic for performance monitoring. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eddie-ozzie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eddie-ozzie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.