Skip to main content

Security report for ecotek.com

Ecotek · Energy · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ecotek is an environmental problem-solving company specializing in air quality management and regulatory compliance services. The company targets commercial, industrial, manufacturing, and institutional clients, offering environmental services, data management, and software applications to help clients manage regulatory impacts effectively. The website positions Ecotek as a leading environmental engineering company with a focus on compliance and software solutions. The technical infrastructure of the website is based on standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS with Bootstrap, JavaScript, and jQuery. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks advanced CMS or modern frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to basic, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. From a security perspective, the website lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring trust. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact information or incident response details are provided, indicating gaps in compliance and security posture. The use of Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms further highlights privacy compliance issues. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and meet modern standards. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecotek.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ecotek operates in the environmental compliance and engineering sector, focusing on air quality management and regulatory consulting. Its competitive advantage lies in combining environmental services with custom software development tailored to client needs. The business model revolves around service partnerships with commercial and industrial clients, providing compliance solutions and data management. The target customer segments include manufacturing, industrial, and institutional organizations requiring regulatory compliance assistance. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the detailed service offerings and structured website suggest a stable niche presence. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, indicating a focused operational scope.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential data interception and privacy risks. The lack of incident response and vulnerability disclosure information suggests limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations are evident due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of contact information further reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the security culture appears underdeveloped, necessitating urgent improvements to protect business and client data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including a security contact email.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ecotek
Description
Ecotek is an environmental problem solving company. We form partnerships with clients to solve their regulatory compliance problems.
Key services
Environmental Services, Data Management, Software Applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (Bootstrap), JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, ASP, VB Script, .Net, SQL, VB, Access, Visio, OOP
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Google Analytics implemented
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides detailed environmental compliance and software services
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage
  4. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent
  5. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in provided data
  6. Navigation is clear with structured menus and submenus
  7. Content is focused on environmental regulatory compliance and software solutions
  8. No forms detected on homepage; no data collection observed
  9. No social media links found in provided content
  10. Logo is present in header at /img/logo.png
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional technology stack with HTML5, CSS (Bootstrap), JavaScript, and jQuery. It includes legacy technologies such as ASP, VB Script, and .Net references, indicating a mix of modern and older technologies. The site loads Google Analytics scripts asynchronously for tracking. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks a modern CMS or advanced frameworks, which may limit scalability and ease of maintenance. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN usage. Technical debt is suggested by legacy script usage and missing security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving mobile responsiveness, and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecotek.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecotek.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.