Skip to main content

Security report for ecotehnologijas.lv

Eco Tehnoloģijas · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eco Tehnoloģijas is a Latvian company specializing in environmentally friendly bio sewage and wastewater solutions, including bio-treatment equipment, water supply, sewage systems, and landscaping services. The company positions itself as a professional provider of environmental technology solutions targeting a general audience interested in sustainable infrastructure. The website reflects a small business with consistent branding and a clear focus on its niche market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA to enhance security. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies and lack of visible contact information reduce transparency. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture with room for improvement in compliance documentation and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecotehnologijas.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ecotehnologijas.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ecotehnologijas.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the environmental technology sector, focusing on bio-treatment and water management solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to local or regional clients seeking sustainable infrastructure solutions. The presence of social media links and structured data indicates an effort to maintain digital presence and SEO. Advertising and tracking are conducted via major platforms like Google, Facebook, and TikTok, suggesting active marketing efforts. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the site may limit trust for new customers. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused service portfolio and moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating a solid baseline security posture. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the ability for external parties to report security issues responsibly. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed in the HTML content. The site uses up-to-date libraries and plugins, reducing risk from known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding formal policies and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page linked from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit contact information including company email and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent and privacy compliance to align with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eco Tehnoloģijas
Description
Profesionāli vides tehnoloģiju risinājumi - bio attīrīšanas iekārtas, ūdensapgāde, kanalizācijas sistēmas un teritorijas labiekārtošana.
Key services
bio attīrīšanas iekārtas, ūdensapgāde, kanalizācijas sistēmas, teritorijas labiekārtošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, TikTok
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and third-party cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  8. No privacy policy page explicitly found or linked in the HTML content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA and Google Tag Manager.
  10. Advertising and tracking via major platforms (Google, Facebook, TikTok) with consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern technologies including jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads asynchronously Google reCAPTCHA scripts and uses Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website suitable for a small business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecotehnologijas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecotehnologijas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.