Skip to main content

Security report for ecomas.cl

Ecomas · Energy · Chile

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ecomas is a Chilean company specializing in sustainable heating solutions, primarily offering certified pellets, stoves, and related accessories through an e-commerce platform. The company holds a unique European EN plus A1 certification for its pellets, positioning it as a market leader in Chile's energy sector focused on eco-friendly heating. The website targets consumers and businesses seeking high-quality, sustainable heating products. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, Bulma CSS, and FontAwesome, with a WordPress backend indicated by sitemap and URL structures. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though content quality is basic with some loading placeholders visible. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS in use but lacks comprehensive security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecomas.cl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ecomas operates in the energy sector with a focus on sustainable heating products, leveraging a unique European certification to differentiate itself in the Chilean market. Its business model combines e-commerce sales with physical retail presence (sucursales). The company targets environmentally conscious consumers and businesses. The website reflects moderate digital maturity with modern frontend frameworks and analytics integration. However, the absence of direct contact information on the homepage and limited published compliance documentation suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory adherence. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and user behavior tracking. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating basic security hygiene. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to privacy regulation non-compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy laws such as GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ecomas
Description
Pellet Ecomas, único pellet certificado en Chile, certificación Europea EN plus A1, el cual asegura un alto poder calorífico.
Key services
Pellets, Estufas (Stoves), Accesorios (Accessories), Comparador de estufas
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Bulma CSS, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by canonical and og:url using https

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to invalid domain query format; domain likely registered without www prefix.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and good SEO practices.
  4. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact likely via contact page.
  6. Presence of European pellet certification is a strong trust indicator.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Vue.js, Bulma CSS framework, FontAwesome icons, and Slick carousel for UI components. The backend appears to be WordPress, as indicated by sitemap and URL patterns. The site uses ES modules for JavaScript, indicating a modern build process. Performance is moderate with some loading placeholders visible, suggesting asynchronous content loading or incomplete data fetching on initial load. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical URLs. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and performance optimizations to reduce loading placeholders.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecomas.cl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecomas.cl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.