Skip to main content

Security report for ecomark.lv

SIA Ecomark · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Ecomark is a Latvian company specializing in renewable energy with a focus on biomass production and agricultural land management. Established in 2009, it has developed a strong regional presence in Latvia, supplying wood chips and managing fast-growing willow plantations to produce thermal energy. The company demonstrates a solid business model with clear service offerings and a well-maintained digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, providing a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and privacy mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the company appears legitimate and professional, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecomark.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ecomark operates primarily in the Latvian renewable energy sector, targeting biomass energy consumers such as municipal heating plants in various Latvian cities. Its competitive advantage lies in its integrated biomass production chain and extensive experience since 2009. The company leverages private forest and agricultural resources for raw materials, indicating strong local partnerships. The business model is B2B focused, supplying energy materials and managing land resources. The website content and contact information support a medium-sized enterprise with regional influence. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be a gap in security transparency. The contact form collects personal data but lacks visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam measures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, explicit security policies, and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an explicit security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add CAPTCHA or other anti-spam protections to contact forms to reduce spam and abuse risks.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA ECOMARK
Registration number
40103216779
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Ecomark
Description
SIA Ecomark is a company operating successfully in the renewable energy sector since 2009. Main activities include management of agricultural land, production and delivery of wood chips. The company produces and supplies up to 600,000 MWh of thermal energy annually, sourcing 80% of raw materials from private forests and agricultural lands. They manage full biomass production chain and operate over 700 hectares of fast-growing willow plantations for energy production.
Key services
Agricultural land management, Wood chip production, Wood chip delivery, Biomass energy supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Astra Theme, Google Fonts, Cookie Notice plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Cookie Notice)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English metadata.
  3. Clear business focus on renewable energy and biomass.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and includes phone, email, address, and contact form.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in footer.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Fonts are used for typography. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation enhancements. No hosting provider details were found. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecomark.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecomark.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.