Skip to main content

Security report for eclipping.org

Tecnavia · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tecnavia is a specialized provider of digital publishing solutions targeting media professionals, clipping bureaus, and press associations. Their offerings include digital replica editions, press review tools, and advanced marketplace services. The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates modern technologies such as Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site demonstrates good content quality and professional design with clear navigation and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness and should be investigated further. Overall, the website presents a credible business presence with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eclipping.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eclipping.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eclipping.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tecnavia operates in the media and technology sectors, providing B2B digital publishing solutions. Their market positioning is niche, focusing on press associations and clipping bureaus. The business model revolves around software and service offerings for digital content management and monetization. The company leverages partnerships, notably with NewsMemory, to enhance its service ecosystem. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product portfolio and integration of modern web technologies. However, the lack of visible company contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens the defense against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present. The use of third-party services like Google Analytics and Cookiebot is transparent and managed via consent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tecnavia
Description
Tecnavia provides e-publishing solutions including digital replica editions, press review services, and advanced marketplace tools targeting clipping bureaus, press associations, and publishers.
Key services
Digital Replica, e-Clip Press Review, 2-in-One App, Website headless CMS, Metered Paywall, e-Archive, e-Tearsheets, Advanced Marketplace, Legal Notices
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.1.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 1.12.4, MediaElement.js, Cookiebot, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No visible security headers in HTML source
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear
  5. Website built on WordPress with Enfold theme
  6. Google Analytics used for traffic analysis
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on analyzed page
  8. Contact form available on separate contact page
  9. Privacy policy present and linked
  10. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 5.1.1 with the Enfold theme, utilizing jQuery and MediaElement.js for interactive features. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, and Google Analytics tracks user behavior. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with Yoast SEO plugin integration. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern but requires updates and security enhancements to reduce risks associated with outdated components and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eclipping.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eclipping.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.