Skip to main content

Security report for easywine.lv

EASY WINE · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Easy Wine is a small hospitality business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in a wine bar and pizza restaurant experience. The website presents a professional and inviting atmosphere emphasizing quality Italian-style pizzas and a curated wine selection. The business targets local residents and visitors seeking a cozy dining experience with a focus on wine and food pairing. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and AOS for animations, providing a responsive and user-friendly interface. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The contact information is comprehensive and consistent, including phone, email, physical address, and social media links, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve its security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easywine.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on wine and pizza pairing. Its market position is local and specialized, catering to a mature audience interested in quality dining experiences. The business model is traditional dine-in with reservation and feedback options. The website supports the business with clear branding, social media presence, and contact channels. There is no evidence of complex revenue streams or partnerships beyond social media engagement. Growth potential could be enhanced by adding online ordering or delivery services. The lack of WHOIS transparency is common for small businesses and does not significantly detract from perceived legitimacy given the consistent website content and contact details.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communication. The contact form includes basic anti-spam measures such as a honeypot field and disables CAPTCHA, which may reduce user friction but could increase spam risk. No security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, indicating a low maturity level in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy policies, and security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider enabling CAPTCHA or other anti-spam mechanisms on the contact form to reduce spam submissions.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and compliance with best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EASY WINE
Description
A wine bar and pizza restaurant offering a cozy atmosphere with a menu featuring traditional Italian pizzas and a wide selection of wines from around the world. The business emphasizes quality ingredients, hospitality, and a memorable dining experience.
Key services
Pizza dining, Wine bar, Reservations, Customer feedback/contact
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Boxicons, Google Maps Embed
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://easywine.lv/)
  • Form uses POST method with anti-spam honeypot field
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in multiple locations including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports business legitimacy.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No explicit security certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
  7. Website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the hospitality industry.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and AOS for scroll animations. The site loads external CSS and JS libraries from local assets and Google Maps for location embedding. The HTML structure is semantic and includes meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile optimization. The contact form uses POST method with hidden anti-spam fields but lacks CAPTCHA. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy resources. Accessibility is basic with some semantic tags but no ARIA attributes detected. SEO is supported by meta description and keywords but could be improved with structured data markup, which is absent. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easywine.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easywine.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.