Skip to main content

Security report for earthshipbiras.fr

Earthship Biras en Dordogne · Energy · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Earthship Biras en Dordogne operates a niche informational website focused on promoting and sharing experiences about an autonomous Earthship house located in Dordogne, France. The business targets eco-conscious individuals interested in sustainable living and autonomous housing solutions. The website offers content about the house's history, life experience, rental opportunities, conferences, and related publications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted by OVH, and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and lacking published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in compliance and security to enhance trust and user protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching earthshipbiras.fr

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the energy and real estate sectors with a focus on sustainable and autonomous housing. Its market position is niche, serving a specialized audience interested in Earthship technology and eco-friendly living. The business model appears to be informational with ancillary services such as rentals, conferences, and book sales. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company is small, founded in 2019, and maintains consistent branding and content quality. The lack of explicit contact details and social media presence limits broader market engagement and trust signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There are no published security or incident response policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms like security.txt are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The site uses third-party plugins and scripts, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and communicate an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Earthship Biras en Dordogne
Description
A website dedicated to sharing information and experience about an autonomous Earthship house in Biras, Dordogne, France. The house is self-sufficient in heating, electricity, and water, featuring a greenhouse for plants and vegetables. The site provides historical context, life experience, rental/visit information, conference details, a book, photos, and contact options.
Key services
Information sharing about Earthship housing, Rental and visit opportunities, Conference hosting, Book promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, FooBox Image Lightbox, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based informational site about an autonomous Earthship house in Dordogne, France.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact available only via a contact form; no emails or phone numbers explicitly listed.
  4. No social media links or external business partner domains detected.
  5. No advertising or tracking technologies detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Security headers are missing, which is a security best practice gap.
  7. Site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate from OVH hosting.
  8. Content is relevant and well-structured but lacks comprehensive legal and privacy documentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.23 with a custom theme 'esteem-pro' and uses jQuery 1.12.4 along with FooBox Image Lightbox plugin. It loads Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons for styling. The hosting provider is OVH, a reputable European hosting company. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site structure is clear with a navigation menu and search functionality. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with earthshipbiras.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review earthshipbiras.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.