Skip to main content

Security report for e.cash

Bitcoin ABC · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eCash is a cryptocurrency platform focused on providing fast, secure, and scalable digital cash solutions for the internet. The platform offers key services such as staking, non-custodial wallets, token and NFT creation, and blockchain development tools. Positioned as a future-forward decentralized digital cash solution, eCash targets cryptocurrency users, developers, and investors seeking financial freedom and blockchain innovation. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates with multiple major cryptocurrency exchanges, enhancing its market presence and accessibility. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and good accessibility. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers, although explicit privacy and cookie policies are absent. The site integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the platform demonstrates a strong posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of published incident response contacts, vulnerability disclosure policies, and data protection officer information suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in the cryptocurrency sector, but limits public verification of registrant details. Overall, eCash presents a credible and professional cryptocurrency platform with strong technical and security foundations. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance, transparency, and formal security policies would further strengthen trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e.cash

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eCash operates in the competitive cryptocurrency market, focusing on scalability and internet cash usability. Its business model revolves around providing a decentralized digital cash ecosystem with staking incentives, tokenization capabilities, and developer tools. The platform's partnerships with numerous exchanges and integration with social media channels indicate a robust ecosystem and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, staking services, and developer ecosystem growth. The target audience includes crypto enthusiasts, developers, and investors. Growth indicators include active exchange listings and ongoing technology development. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, positioning itself as a significant player in the digital cash space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. The use of security best practices such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security enhances protection against common web threats. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in formal security governance and transparency. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The platform would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and publicly available incident response procedures to improve trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information including security and abuse email addresses.
  4. Enhance transparency by disclosing data protection officer contact details and relevant certifications.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bitcoin ABC
Description
eCash is a fast, secure, and scalable cryptocurrency designed for the internet. Offering staking, non-custodial solutions, fixed supply, and support for NFTs and etokens, eCash is the future of decentralized digital cash.
Key services
Cryptocurrency transactions, Staking, Non-custodial wallets, Token and NFT creation, Blockchain development tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact email is provided in footer: contact@e.cash
  4. Strong presence on social media platforms and multiple cryptocurrency exchanges.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. Good security headers and HTTPS enforced.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information published.
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no registrant details.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast client-side interactions. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with preloading of critical assets and efficient image handling. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack supports scalability and maintainability, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate potential security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e.cash. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e.cash.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.