Skip to main content

Security report for e-boekhouden.nl

e-Boekhouden.nl · Finance · Netherlands

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

e-Boekhouden.nl is a leading online bookkeeping and invoicing software provider in the Netherlands, serving a large user base of over 500,000 customers. The company offers SaaS-based accounting solutions targeted primarily at small to medium-sized businesses and freelancers. The website is professionally designed with good content relevance and clear navigation, optimized for mobile devices. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Font Awesome 6 Pro icons, multiple analytics and tracking services, and a consent management platform (Cookiebot) to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers likely in place, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-boekhouden.nl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as the most used bookkeeping software in the Netherlands, indicating strong market penetration and brand recognition. Its SaaS business model focuses on providing accessible online accounting tools, appealing to SMEs and freelancers. The extensive use of tracking and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to marketing and user engagement. However, the absence of explicit contact information and legal policies on the website could be a barrier for some users seeking trust signals. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a professional online presence, supporting its credibility in the finance sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but are standard for commercial websites. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates potential gaps in security governance and transparency. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
e-Boekhouden.nl
Description
Online bookkeeping and invoicing software, described as the most used bookkeeping program in the Netherlands with over 500,000 users.
Key services
Online bookkeeping, Invoicing, Accounting software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Bing UET, Hotjar, TikTok Analytics Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and functional.
  2. Strong use of tracking and analytics tools with consent management.
  3. Lack of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML content.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and fonts (Font Awesome 6 Pro).
  7. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with asynchronous loading of JavaScript libraries, including Font Awesome 6 Pro for icons, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Bing UET, Hotjar, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating compliance efforts. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and scripts efficiently, suggesting moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements detected. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly found in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is robust but could benefit from improved documentation of security and privacy practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-boekhouden.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-boekhouden.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.