Dzīvības poga is a Latvian-based healthcare service provider specializing in remote emergency alert systems designed to ensure safety and peace of mind for elderly and vulnerable individuals. The company offers a subscription model with devices that enable SOS calls, 24/7 operator communication, geolocation tracking, and data storage for medical information. Their market position is focused on a niche segment within Latvia, supported by partnerships and participation in European Social Fund projects. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information, enhancing trust and credibility.
Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. While the site is responsive and well-structured, there is room for improvement in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration verification, but the website content and contact details align with a legitimate small healthcare service provider.
Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacking visible security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses extensive user tracking via third-party scripts, which should be balanced with stronger privacy controls. Overall, the risk is low, but strategic improvements in security policies, incident response transparency, and privacy compliance are recommended to strengthen the security and trust framework.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention dzivibaspoga.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dzivibaspoga.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Dzīvības poga operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting elderly individuals and families seeking emergency alert solutions. Their business model revolves around subscription services for emergency alert devices with continuous monitoring. The company leverages partnerships, including financial institutions like SEB, and participates in EU-funded social projects, indicating growth and community engagement. Their competitive advantage lies in offering comprehensive emergency solutions with 24/7 operator support and advanced features like fall detection and geolocation. Revenue streams likely include device sales and monthly monitoring fees. The company maintains a focused presence in Latvia with a small organizational size and consistent branding. The partnership ecosystem and clear service offerings position them well within their niche market.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected in the HTML source, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking services, though these increase the attack surface and privacy risks. There is no visible security or incident response policy published, nor contact channels for security issues, which is a compliance gap. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare service provider but would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and privacy safeguards.
Recommendations
Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve trust and compliance.
Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and reduce privacy risks.
Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust seals to strengthen business credibility.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Dzīvības poga
Description
Dzīvības poga is a remote alert system providing continuous connection with loved ones in unforeseen situations requiring medical or other assistance. It offers emergency SOS calls, data storage for medical info, 24/7 operator communication, and geolocation services.
Key services
Emergency SOS call, Data storage for medical and personal info, 24/7 operator communication, Geolocation tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap 4.6.1, Slick Carousel, jQuery, Hotjar, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS usage implied by URL
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address provided in footer.
Privacy policy present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts used.
No visible security headers in HTML source; HTTPS usage assumed but not verified.
No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Business focuses on emergency alert devices and monitoring services for elderly and vulnerable populations.
Website uses modern frontend technologies and responsive design.
No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern and popular frontend stack including Bootstrap 4.6.1 and Slick Carousel for responsive design and interactive elements. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and content relevance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected, and no server-side security headers were visible in the HTML source. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. There is an opportunity to enhance accessibility features and implement stronger security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dzivibaspoga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dzivibaspoga.lv.