Skip to main content

Security report for dzirde.lv

SIA Dinas Tanbergas dzirdes klīnika · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Dinas Tanbergas dzirdes klīnika is a Latvian healthcare provider specializing in audiology services including hearing tests, hearing aid selection and fitting, custom ear molds, and audiologist consultations. The company operates certified clinics in Riga, Valmiera, and Daugavpils, targeting individuals with hearing impairments. Their business model combines professional healthcare services with e-commerce sales of hearing devices and accessories. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, featuring multilingual support and modern UI elements such as sliders and cookie consent management. Technical infrastructure includes integration with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and user behavior tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is supported by a detailed cookie consent mechanism, though no explicit privacy policy page was identified. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for a small healthcare business in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dzirde.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a certified healthcare provider with experienced specialists and quality hearing products from reputable brands like Unitron, Audio Service, and Phonak. Their competitive advantages include personalized service, home visits, and multilingual support. Revenue streams likely include consultation fees, hearing aid sales, and custom ear mold manufacturing. The website's integration with marketing and analytics tools indicates a focus on customer acquisition and retention. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the business information and content quality support legitimacy. The company appears focused on regional markets within Latvia with potential for growth through enhanced digital marketing and service expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms from spam. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance. The use of third-party plugins and analytics tools requires ongoing patch management to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare website but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy or contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities from outdated software.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to provide security researchers with a clear disclosure channel and improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Dinas Tanbergas dzirdes klīnika
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Dinas Tanbergas dzirdes klīnika
Description
Dodot iespēju dzirdēt mēs sniedzam iespēju saprast un sazināties. SIA "Dinas Tanbergas dzirdes klīnika" piedāvā dzirdes speciālista konsultācijas, dzirdes pārbaudes, dzirdes aparātu izvēli un pielāgošanu, individuālo auss ieliktņu izgatavošanu, audiologopēda pakalpojumus un mājas vizītes Rīgā, Valmierā un Daugavpilī.
Key services
Dzirdes speciālista konsultācija un dzirdes pārbaude, Dzirdes aparātu izvēle un pielāgošana, Individuālo auss ieliktņu izgatavošana, Audiologopēda pakalpojumi, Mājas vizītes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Smart Slider 3, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent Management, Polylang (multilingual), jQuery, Slick Slider, MakeCommerce payment gateway
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Sourcebuster
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian hearing clinic offering audiology services and hearing aids.
  2. Content is in Latvian with Russian language alternative available.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality.
  4. Cookie consent management is implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing.
  6. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  8. No privacy policy or terms of service pages clearly identified in the HTML content.
  9. Contact information includes phone number and email in header and contact page.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular plugins such as Smart Slider 3 for UI, Polylang for multilingual support, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. Performance is moderate with some use of lazy loading and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is appropriate for a small healthcare business, though opportunities exist to improve security and performance through additional optimizations and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dzirde.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dzirde.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.