Skip to main content

Security report for dyinglightgame.com

Techland S.A. · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Techland S.A. operates the official website for the Dying Light franchise, a well-established video game series with over 40 million players worldwide. The website serves as a central hub for game information, news, community engagement, and digital sales, targeting gamers interested in parkour and zombie-themed entertainment. The company maintains a strong market position with consistent branding and a professional online presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Hosting is managed via AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and trustworthy, supporting Techland's business objectives effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dyinglightgame.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Techland S.A. leverages the Dying Light brand to engage a large gaming audience through digital distribution and community platforms. The business model focuses on game sales, pre-orders, and community-driven content such as the Pilgrim Outpost hub. The company benefits from a loyal fan base and active social media channels, enhancing market reach and customer retention. Partnerships with major digital storefronts like Steam, PlayStation Store, Xbox Store, and Epic Games Store are prominently featured, indicating a broad distribution network. The website's multilingual support and regular news updates demonstrate a commitment to global market engagement and customer communication. Strategic observations include the potential to expand direct contact options and enhance security transparency to further build trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS represents areas for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness communication. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business context but could be strengthened to mitigate emerging threats and demonstrate proactive security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance browser security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Expand direct contact options on the website, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve customer support and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Techland S.A.
Description
Explore the ultimate parkour zombie-slaying franchise and experience worlds loved by 40 Million Players.
Key services
Video game sales, Community engagement, News and updates, Pre-order and digital distribution
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, YouTube API, AWS DNS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent logos and messaging.
  3. Multiple language support available.
  4. Active social media integration.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via support links.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled; recommended for improved DNS security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern web stack utilizing JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, with integration of third-party services for analytics and consent management. Hosting is provided via AWS DNS infrastructure, ensuring reliable uptime and scalability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts asynchronously to minimize impact on load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no indication of a CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dyinglightgame.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dyinglightgame.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.